Skip to main content

[Protests of Army Solicitations for Construction]

B-254006,B-254093,B-254099,B-254100,B-254101,B-254102,B-254103,B Published: Nov 16, 1993. Publicly Released: Nov 16, 1993.
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

A firm protested several Army solicitations for construction, contending that the procurements should have been set aside for small disadvantaged businesses (SDB). GAO held that the Army reasonably determined: (1) that it would not receive bids from at least two responsible SDB; and (2) not to set aside the procurement. Accordingly, the protests were denied.

Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
Managing Director
Office of Public Affairs

Public Inquiries

Topics

Army procurementBid protestsBidder responsibilityConstruction contractsDefense economic analysisFair market valueSmall business set-asidesProcurementSolicitationsConstructionU.S. ArmyBid proposalsProtestsDisadvantaged businessIntellectual property rightsSet-asides