[Protest of Army Contract Award for Food Services]

B-251912: May 11, 1993

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protested an Army contract award for food services, contending that: (1) the award was inconsistent with the solicitation specifications; and (2) discussions were inadequate. GAO held that the Army: (1) properly based its award decision on the solicitation's evaluation criteria; (2) awarded the contract to the bidder that was the most advantageous to the government, not the low, technically acceptable bidder; and (3) adequately advised the protester that its bid deficiencies required correction. Accordingly, the protest was denied.

Oct 17, 2017

Oct 13, 2017

Oct 12, 2017

Oct 11, 2017

  • Daekee Global Company, Ltd.
    We dismiss the protest because the protester has not established that it is an interested party.

Oct 10, 2017

Oct 6, 2017

Oct 5, 2017

Looking for more? Browse all our products here