[Request for Reconsideration of Protest of Army Solicitation]

A firm requested reconsideration of its protest against an Army solicitation for a fire alarm reporting system. GAO had held that the protester failed to provide evidence: (1) that the Army's decision to use negotiated procedures was unreasonable; and (2) regarding which specifications were deficient. In its request for reconsideration, the protester contended that it provided sufficient information regarding its specifications protest. GAO held that the protester failed to show any legal or factual errors that warranted reversal or modification of the original decision. Accordingly, the request for reconsideration was denied.