[Protests of Army Contract Award for Technical and Administrative Support Services]

B-237618,B-237618.2: Mar 12, 1990

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

Two firms protested an Army contract award for technical and administrative support services. The first protester contended that the: (1) Army's evaluation criteria conflicted with its statement of work; and (2) Army favored the awardee by misapplying certain evaluation criteria. The second protester contended that the Army improperly evaluated its bid costs. GAO held that: (1) the first protester untimely protested the allegedly conflicting evaluation criteria; (2) there was no evidence of bias in evaluation, since the first protester's receipt of a maximum score for those criteria would still not have entitled it to award; and (3) the Army properly evaluated the second protester's bid costs. Accordingly, the protests were dismissed in part and denied in part.

Oct 13, 2017

Oct 12, 2017

Oct 11, 2017

  • Daekee Global Company, Ltd.
    We dismiss the protest because the protester has not established that it is an interested party.

Oct 10, 2017

Oct 6, 2017

Oct 5, 2017

Looking for more? Browse all our products here