[Protest of UMTA Contract Award for Special Analyses]

B-229547: Mar 14, 1988

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protested an Urban Mass Transportation Administration (UMTA) contract award for special analyses, contending that: (1) UMTA improperly downgraded its bid for weaknesses which were not directly related to the evaluation criteria; (2) UMTA did not hold adequate discussions; and (3) the alleged weaknesses resulted from the agency's faulty evaluation of its bid. GAO held that: (1) the protester untimely filed after award its protest against the agency's bid evaluation; (2) UMTA reasonably evaluated the protester's bid consistently with the solicitation's evaluation criteria; and (3) UMTA properly advised the protester of its bid's weaknesses. Accordingly, the protest was dismissed in part and denied in part.

Oct 13, 2017

Oct 12, 2017

Oct 11, 2017

  • Daekee Global Company, Ltd.
    We dismiss the protest because the protester has not established that it is an interested party.

Oct 10, 2017

Oct 6, 2017

Oct 5, 2017

Looking for more? Browse all our products here