Skip to main content

B-226401, APR 3, 1987, 87-1 CPD 379

B-226401 Apr 03, 1987
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

PROCUREMENT - BID PROTESTS - MOOT ALLEGATION - GAO REVIEW DIGEST: PROTEST IS DISMISSED AS ACADEMIC WHERE THE CONTRACTING AGENCY REPORTS THAT IT HAS TAKEN APPROPRIATE ACTION TO REMEDY THE PROCUREMENT DEFICIENCY. RAPID PRODUCTION CONTENDS THAT THE ARMY'S CALCULATION THAT SOLAR FLAME'S OFFERED PRICE WAS LOWER THAN THE PRICE OFFERED BY RAPID PRODUCTION WAS WRONG. THE ARMY REPORTS THAT THE PROTESTER IS CORRECT. THAT IS. RAPID PRODUCTION SHOULD HAVE BEEN FOUND TO BE THE LOW OFFEROR. THE ARMY REPORTS THAT IT WILL AWARD THE CONTRACT TO RAPID PRODUCTION. IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT THE ARMY AGREES WITH THE PROTESTER AND WILL TAKE ACTION TO CORRECT ITS AWARD ERROR IF NECESSARY. THE PROTEST IS ACADEMIC.

View Decision

B-226401, APR 3, 1987, 87-1 CPD 379

PROCUREMENT - BID PROTESTS - MOOT ALLEGATION - GAO REVIEW DIGEST: PROTEST IS DISMISSED AS ACADEMIC WHERE THE CONTRACTING AGENCY REPORTS THAT IT HAS TAKEN APPROPRIATE ACTION TO REMEDY THE PROCUREMENT DEFICIENCY.

RAPID PRODUCTION CO., INC.:

RAPID PRODUCTION CO., INC., PROTESTS AWARD OF A CONTRACT TO SOLAR FLAME, INC., BY THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. DAAA03-86-R-0066, ISSUED BY THE PINE BLUFF ARSENAL. RAPID PRODUCTION CONTENDS THAT THE ARMY'S CALCULATION THAT SOLAR FLAME'S OFFERED PRICE WAS LOWER THAN THE PRICE OFFERED BY RAPID PRODUCTION WAS WRONG. WE DISMISS THE PROTEST.

THE ARMY REPORTS THAT THE PROTESTER IS CORRECT, THAT IS, RAPID PRODUCTION SHOULD HAVE BEEN FOUND TO BE THE LOW OFFEROR. HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTING OFFICER HAS DETERMINED RAPID PRODUCTION TO BE NONRESPONSIBLE AND HAS REFERRED THE MATTER TO THE SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION (SBA) FOR A CERTIFICATE OF COMPETENCY DETERMINATION. A STOP WORK ORDER HAS BEEN ISSUED TO SOLAR FLAME PENDING RESOLUTION OF THE RESPONSIBILITY ISSUE BY THE SBA. IF THE SBA ULTIMATELY DETERMINES RAPID PRODUCTION TO BE RESPONSIBLE, THE ARMY REPORTS THAT IT WILL AWARD THE CONTRACT TO RAPID PRODUCTION.

IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT THE ARMY AGREES WITH THE PROTESTER AND WILL TAKE ACTION TO CORRECT ITS AWARD ERROR IF NECESSARY, THE PROTEST IS ACADEMIC. SEE TOPLEY REALTY CO., INC., B-221459, APR. 23, 1986, 65 COMP.GEN. ***, 86-1 CPD PARA. 398 AT 9. CONCERNING THE CONTRACTING OFFICER'S DETERMINATION THAT RAPID PRODUCTION IS NOT RESPONSIBLE, SINCE RAPID PRODUCTION IS A SMALL BUSINESS THE MATTER APPROPRIATELY HAS BEEN REFERRED TO THE SBA FOR REVIEW UNDER ITS CERTIFICATE OF COMPETENCY PROCEDURES IN ACCORD WITH ITS CONCLUSIVE AUTHORITY UNDER 15 U.S.C. SEC. 637(B)(7) (1982). SEE SEALTECH, INC.-- REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION, B-221584.2, MAR. 13, 1986, 86-1 CPD PARA. 254; 4 C.F.R. SEC. 21.3(F)(3) (1986).

GAO Contacts

Office of Public Affairs