Skip to main content

B-21063, OCTOBER 28, 1941, 21 COMP. GEN. 382

B-21063 Oct 28, 1941
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

IS IN CONTRAVENTION OF THE PROVISIONS OF THE ACT OF MARCH 4. THE TRAVELING EXPENSE APPROPRIATION OF THE FEDERAL SECURITY AGENCY IS AVAILABLE FOR REIMBURSEMENT TO PERSONNEL OF SUCH AGENCY. 1941: I HAVE YOUR LETTER OF OCTOBER 8. A GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE WAS DRAWN UP BY THE DIVISION OF PERSONNEL SUPERVISION AND MANAGEMENT OF THE FEDERAL SECURITY AGENCY AND WAS SUBMITTED TO THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION FOR APPROVAL ON AUGUST 20. A COPY OF WHICH IS ATTACHED FOR YOUR INFORMATION. THE QUESTION ARISES AS TO WHETHER IN CARRYING OUT ITS TERMS ANY EXPENDITURES FOR TRAVEL WOULD BE JUSTIFIED ON THE GROUNDS THAT THE HEARING OF GRIEVANCES OF EMPLOYEES IS OFFICIAL BUSINESS. WHILE THE MOST EFFICIENT AND ECONOMICAL ARRANGEMENTS WILL BE MADE IN EXPENDING MONIES FOR THIS PURPOSE IT IS CONCEIVABLE THAT SUCH EXPENDITURES WOULD BE REQUESTED IN A GRIEVANCE CASE FOR THE FOLLOWING PERSONS: 1.

View Decision

B-21063, OCTOBER 28, 1941, 21 COMP. GEN. 382

TRAVELING EXPENSES - HEARINGS ON EMPLOYEE GRIEVANCES - FEDERAL SECURITY AGENCY A COMMITTEE TO HEAR THE GRIEVANCES OF EMPLOYEES OF THE FEDERAL SECURITY AGENCY, SET UP UNDER EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 7916, JUNE 24, 1938, THE MEMBERSHIP OF WHICH INCLUDES EMPLOYEES OF OTHER FEDERAL AGENCIES, IS IN CONTRAVENTION OF THE PROVISIONS OF THE ACT OF MARCH 4, 1909, PROHIBITING THE EMPLOYMENT BY DETAIL OR OTHERWISE OF SERVICES FROM ANY GOVERNMENT ESTABLISHMENT IN CONNECTION WITH THE WORK OF A COMMISSION, COUNCIL, BOARD OR SIMILAR BODY. THE TRAVELING EXPENSE APPROPRIATION OF THE FEDERAL SECURITY AGENCY IS AVAILABLE FOR REIMBURSEMENT TO PERSONNEL OF SUCH AGENCY--- BUT NOT TO PERSONNEL OF OTHER FEDERAL AGENCIES OR TO PERSONS NOT IN THE FEDERAL SERVICE--- FOR TRAVELING EXPENSES PROPERLY INCURRED INCIDENT TO HEARINGS OF LEGITIMATE GRIEVANCES OF EMPLOYEES AS AUTHORIZED BY EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 7916 ISSUED JUNE 24, 1938.

COMPTROLLER GENERAL WARREN TO THE FEDERAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATOR, OCTOBER 28, 1941:

I HAVE YOUR LETTER OF OCTOBER 8, 1941, AS FOLLOWS:

EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 7916 ISSUED BY THE PRESIDENT ON JUNE 24, 1938, IN SECTION 6 IN CONNECTION WITH THE DUTIES OF DIRECTORS OF PERSONNEL, PROVIDES:

"SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE HEAD OF SUCH DEPARTMENT OR ESTABLISHMENT AND OF THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION HE SHALL ESTABLISH MEANS FOR THE HEARING OF GRIEVANCES OF EMPLOYEES AND PRESENT APPROPRIATE RECOMMENDATION FOR THE SETTLEMENT THEREOF TO THE HEAD OF HIS DEPARTMENT OR ESTABLISHMENT.'

ON FEBRUARY 24, 1941, THE UNITED STATES CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION PROMULGATED DEPARTMENTAL CIRCULAR NO. 251 ENTITLED " STATEMENT OF POLICY RELATIVE TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF MEANS FOR THE HEARING OF GRIEVANCES OF EMPLOYEES.' FOLLOWING THE TERMS OF THIS STATEMENT OF POLICY, A GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE WAS DRAWN UP BY THE DIVISION OF PERSONNEL SUPERVISION AND MANAGEMENT OF THE FEDERAL SECURITY AGENCY AND WAS SUBMITTED TO THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION FOR APPROVAL ON AUGUST 20, 1941. IN A LETTER OF AUGUST 25, THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION REPLIED, APPROVING THE GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE, A COPY OF WHICH IS ATTACHED FOR YOUR INFORMATION.

IN APPLYING THE GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE TO OUR FIELD SERVICE, THE QUESTION ARISES AS TO WHETHER IN CARRYING OUT ITS TERMS ANY EXPENDITURES FOR TRAVEL WOULD BE JUSTIFIED ON THE GROUNDS THAT THE HEARING OF GRIEVANCES OF EMPLOYEES IS OFFICIAL BUSINESS. WHILE THE MOST EFFICIENT AND ECONOMICAL ARRANGEMENTS WILL BE MADE IN EXPENDING MONIES FOR THIS PURPOSE IT IS CONCEIVABLE THAT SUCH EXPENDITURES WOULD BE REQUESTED IN A GRIEVANCE CASE FOR THE FOLLOWING PERSONS:

1. THE APPELLANT.

2. THE APPELLANT'S REPRESENTATIVE:

A. IF AN EMPLOYEE OF THE FEDERAL SECURITY AGENCY OR ONE OF THE RESPECTIVE BUREAUS, BOARDS OR CONSTITUENT ORGANIZATIONS OF THE AGENCY.

B. IF AN EMPLOYEE OF ANOTHER DEPARTMENT.

3. THE APPELLANT'S WITNESSES:

A. IF EMPLOYEES OF THE FEDERAL SECURITY AGENCY OR ONE OF THE RESPECTIVE BUREAUS, BOARDS OR CONSTITUENT ORGANIZATIONS OF THE AGENCY.

B. IF EMPLOYEES OF OTHER DEPARTMENTS.

C. IF NOT FEDERAL EMPLOYEES.

4. THE APPELLANT'S SUPERVISOR.

5. OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICIALS REPRESENTING THE CONSTITUENT BUREAU, BOARD, OR ORGANIZATION IN THE HEARING.

6. WITNESSES FOR THE CONSTITUENT BUREAU, BOARD, OR ORGANIZATION:

A. IF EMPLOYEES OF THE FEDERAL SECURITY AGENCY OR ONE OF THE RESPECTIVE BUREAUS, BOARDS OR CONSTITUENT ORGANIZATIONS OF THE AGENCY.

B. IF EMPLOYEES OF OTHER DEPARTMENTS.

C. IF NOT FEDERAL EMPLOYEES.

7. THE HEARING COMMITTEE:

A. THE APPELLANT'S MEMBER:

I. IF AN EMPLOYEE OF THE FEDERAL SECURITY AGENCY OR ONE OF THE

RESPECTIVE BUREAUS, BOARDS OR CONSTITUENT ORGANIZATIONS OF THE

AGENCY. II. IF AN EMPLOYEE OF ANOTHER DEPARTMENT.

8. APPROPRIATE REPRESENTATIVE OR REPRESENTATIVES OF THE DIVISION OF PERSONNEL SUPERVISION AND MANAGEMENT.

THIS OFFICE WILL GREATLY APPRECIATE YOUR ADVICE AT YOUR EARLIEST CONVENIENCE AS TO WHETHER TRAVEL EXPENDITURES FOR THE RESPECTIVE PERSONS DESCRIBED ABOVE AND FOR THE PURPOSE INDICATED WOULD BE JUSTIFIED AS OFFICIAL BUSINESS AND HENCE PROPERLY CHARGEABLE AGAINST TRAVEL APPROPRIATIONS.

THE SUBMITTED COPY OF THE GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE IS DESIGNATED, " PERSONNEL BULLETIN NO. 5," AND READS AS FOLLOWS:

PERSONNEL BULLETIN NO. 5.

SUBJECT: PROCEDURE FOR THE ADJUSTMENT OF GRIEVANCES DEPARTMENTAL SERVICE.

GENERAL POLICY:

ANY EMPLOYEE HAS THE RIGHT, AND IS EXPECTED, TO CONSULT FREELY AT ALL TIMES WITH HIS SUPERVISOR CONCERNING ANY QUESTIONS AFFECTING HIS DUTIES, WORKING CONDITIONS, EMPLOYMENT STATUS AND LIKE MATTERS INVOLVED IN THE DAILY PERFORMANCE OF HIS WORK. IN RESPONSE TO REQUESTS FOR SUCH DISCUSSIONS BY EMPLOYEES, SUPERVISORS WILL MAKE THEMSELVES AVAILABLE AND WILL GRANT TO EMPLOYEES UNDER THEIR SUPERVISION COURTEOUS AND SYMPATHETIC INTERVIEWS ON ANY MATTER PERTAINING TO THE EMPLOYEE'S WELFARE OR THE WORK OF THE ORGANIZATION.

THE GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE PROVIDES FOR THE DISPOSITION OF THOSE DISAGREEMENTS ARISING BETWEEN EMPLOYEES AND THEIR SUPERVISORS IN THE DEPARTMENTAL SERVICE WHICH FOR ANY REASON CANNOT BE SATISFACTORILY ADJUSTED BY THEM. IN PRESENTING THEIR COMPLAINTS OR GRIEVANCES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS PROCEDURE, EMPLOYEES OR THEIR REPRESENTATIVES SHALL BE UNIMPEDED AND FREE FROM ANY RESTRAINT, INTERFERENCE, COERCION, DISCRIMINATION, OR REPRISAL.

THE DIRECTOR OF PERSONNEL OF THE FEDERAL SECURITY AGENCY, IN CONSULTATION WITH SUPERVISORS AND EMPLOYEES OR THEIR REPRESENTATIVES, SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROMPT ADMINISTRATION OF THE AGENCY'S GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE HEREIN OUTLINED. THE STAFF OF THE DIVISION OF PERSONNEL SUPERVISION AND MANAGEMENT AND APPROPRIATE OFFICERS OF THE CONSTITUENT ORGANIZATIONS OF THE AGENCY MAY BE CONSULTED BY EMPLOYEES OR THEIR REPRESENTATIVES OR SUPERVISORS IN ANY STAGE OF THE PROCEDURE HEREAFTER PRESCRIBED FOR THE PURPOSE OF SECURING ADVICE ON METHODS OF PROCEDURE, OR OBTAINING INFORMATION CONCERNING EXISTING PERSONNEL REGULATIONS AND INTERPRETATIONS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS UNDER SUCH REGULATIONS.

THE EMPLOYEE RELATIONS POLICY OF THE FEDERAL SECURITY AGENCY PROVIDES THAT:

"EMPLOYEES SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO APPEAL FROM ANY DECISION OF THEIR SUPERVISORS AFFECTING THEIR EMPLOYMENT STATUS, WORKING CONDITIONS, AND THEIR RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES UNDER THIS AND OTHER PERSONNEL POLICIES. CONNECTION WITH SUCH APPEALS, EMPLOYEES SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO DESIGNATE A REPRESENTATIVE OR REPRESENTATIVES OF THEIR OWN CHOOSING. PROCEDURES FOR THE ORDERLY REVIEW OF SUCH APPEALS SHALL BE ESTABLISHED.

" THE DIRECTOR OF PERSONNEL AND APPROPRIATE OFFICERS OF THE CONSTITUENT ORGANIZATIONS OF THE FEDERAL SECURITY AGENCY SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ADVISING BOTH EMPLOYEES AND SUPERVISORS OF THEIR RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES IN THE EXECUTION OF THIS EMPLOYEE RELATIONS POLICY.'

COMPLAINTS OR GRIEVANCES INVOLVING FEDERAL SECURITY AGENCY POLICIES, THE REMEDY FOR WHICH LIES OUTSIDE THE DISCRETION OF THE HEAD OF ANY BRANCH OF THE AGENCY, MAY BE TAKEN UP BY EMPLOYEES OR THEIR REPRESENTATIVES DIRECTLY WITH THE DIRECTOR OF PERSONNEL OF THE AGENCY.

THIS PROCEDURE IS NOT INTENDED TO APPLY TO APPEALS FROM EFFICIENCY RATINGS FOR WHICH A PROCEDURE HAS BEEN PROMULGATED IN CIVIL SERVICE DEPARTMENTAL CIRCULAR NO. 265 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RAMSPECK ACT AND EXECUTIVE ORDER 8748.

GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE:

1. ANY EMPLOYEE (OR GROUP OF EMPLOYEES) IN THE DEPARTMENTAL SERVICE OF THE FEDERAL SECURITY AGENCY (INCLUDING FOR THIS PURPOSE THE ACCOUNTING OPERATIONS DIVISION, SOCIAL SECURITY BOARD, BALTIMORE) WHO HAS A COMPLAINT ARISING OUT OF A DECISION OR ACTION OF HIS SUPERIOR OFFICER OR OFFICERS WILL PRESENT HIS COMPLAINT PERSONALLY TO HIS IMMEDIATE SUPERVISOR, UNLESS HE OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE CAN DEMONSTRATE TO THE NEXT HIGHER SUPERVISOR THAT AN INTERVIEW WITH HIS IMMEDIATE SUPERVISOR WOULD BE PREJUDICIAL TO THE EMPLOYEE WITHIN HIS AUTHORITY; THE SUPERVISOR TO WHOM THE COMPLAINT HAS BEEN PRESENTED SHALL MAKE EVERY EFFORT TO SETTLE THE GRIEVANCE.

2. IF, IN THE OPINION OF THE EMPLOYEE, PROMPT AND EQUITABLE ADJUSTMENT OF HIS COMPLAINT IS NOT SECURED FROM THE SUPERVISOR WHO HEARS THE THE COMPLAINT INITIALLY, THE EMPLOYEE MAY PRESENT THE PROBLEM IN WRITING IN DUPLICATE TO THE SUPERVISOR NEXT IN LINE, DESCRIBING SUCCINCTLY THE SPECIFIC NATURE OF THE COMPLAINT. THE INDIVIDUAL AGAINST WHOM THE GRIEVANCE IS DIRECTED WILL PREPARE A REPLY SETTING FORTH HIS VERSION OF THE MATTER WHICH WILL BE SUBMITTED TO THE EMPLOYEE AND TO THE OFFICIAL NEXT IN LINE. BOTH STATEMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE RECORD AND COPIES WILL BE FORWARDED TO THE DIRECTOR OF PERSONNEL, FEDERAL SECURITY AGENCY. THE OFFICIAL HANDLING THE COMPLAINT AT THIS POINT WILL THEN CONFER INFORMALLY WITH THE EMPLOYEE OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE AND WITH OTHERS CONCERNED. IF SETTLEMENT IS NOT REACHED, THE GRIEVANCE MAY THEN BE PRESENTED IN THE SAME FASHION THROUGH SUPERVISORY CHANNELS AS ESTABLISHED BY THE CONSTITUENT ORGANIZATIONS OF THE AGENCY. ANY SUPERVISOR TO WHOM THE GRIEVANCE IS ADDRESSED SHALL MAKE A DECISION TO THE EMPLOYEE IN WRITING WITHIN FIVE WORKING DAYS AFTER RECEIPT OF THE APPEAL.

3. IF A SETTLEMENT IS NOT REACHED THROUGH SUPERVISORY CHANNELS AS ESTABLISHED BY THE CONSTITUENT ORGANIZATIONS OF THE AGENCY UP TO BUT NOT INCLUDING THE HEAD OF THE CONSTITUENT ORGANIZATION, THE EMPLOYEE OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE MAY APPEAL IN WRITING TO THE HEAD OF HIS CONSTITUENT ORGANIZATION FOR A REVIEW OF HIS CASE BEFORE A HEARING COMMITTEE. THE ORGANIZATION HEAD WILL ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF THIS APPEAL IMMEDIATELY. THE EMPLOYEE'S ORIGINAL APPEAL TOGETHER WITH THE STATEMENT OF THE IMMEDIATE SUPERVISOR, THE DECISIONS OF THE SUBSEQUENT SUPERVISORS, AND ANY OTHER MATERIALS THAT EITHER THE EMPLOYEE OR THE SUPERVISOR CONCERNED MAY WISH TO ADD WILL BE REFERRED TO THE HEAD OF THE ORGANIZATION CONCERNED.

4. THE PROCEDURE FOR APPEAL TO THE HEAD OF A CONSTITUENT ORGANIZATION SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:

(A) THE ORGANIZATION HEAD PROMPTLY AFTER RECEIPT OF THE APPEAL SHALL EITHER EFFECT A SETTLEMENT OF THE GRIEVANCE ACCEPTABLE TO THE EMPLOYEE OR REFER THE CASE WITH ALL MATERIAL PERTAINING THERETO TO A SPECIAL HEARING COMMITTEE WHOSE RECOMMENDATIONS WILL BE ADVISORY IN NATURE AND DESIGNED TO GUIDE THE HEAD OF THE CONSTITUENT ORGANIZATION IN ARRIVING AT A DECISION.

(B) THE HEARING COMMITTEE WILL BE COMPOSED AS FOLLOWS: THE AGGRIEVED EMPLOYEE WILL NAME A PERSON OF HIS CHOICE TO BE A MEMBER OF THE HEARING COMMITTEE; THE ORGANIZATION HEAD WILL NAME THE SECOND MEMBER, AND THE TWO MEMBERS THUS CHOSEN WILL AGREE UPON A THIRD MEMBER WHO WILL ACT AS CHAIRMAN. IF THE FIRST TWO MEMBERS ARE UNABLE TO AGREE UPON A THIRD WITHIN ONE WEEK, TWO OTHER MEMBERS WILL BE CHOSEN IN THEIR STEAD AND THESE TWO NEW MEMBERS WILL SELECT THE THIRD WITHIN ONE WEEK. ALL THREE MEMBERS OF THE HEARING COMMITTEE MUST BE EMPLOYEES OF THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.

(C) THE HEARING COMMITTEE THUS CONSTITUTED SHALL DETERMINE ITS OWN PROCEDURE BY A MAJORITY RULE AFTER CONSULTATION WITH, AND IF POSSIBLE, AGREEMENT BY BOTH PARTIES IN THE DISPUTE PRIOR TO OPENING THE CASE. REPRESENTATIVE OF THE DIVISION OF PERSONNEL SUPERVISION AND MANAGEMENT WILL BE AVAILABLE TO ADVISE THE COMMITTEE ON PROCEDURE IF IT DESIRES SUCH ADVICE. THE COMMITTEE SHALL HAVE ACCESS TO ALL OFFICIAL RECORDS BEARING ON THE CASE AND SHALL HEAR ANY INDIVIDUALS WHOSE TESTIMONY IT DEEMS TO BE RELEVANT. BOTH PARTIES SHALL HAVE AMPLE OPPORTUNITY TO PRESENT THEIR SIDES OF THE CASE PERSONALLY OR THROUGH WITNESSES OR WRITTEN MATERIAL AND TO REVIEW OR REBUT ANY EVIDENCE PRESENTED; AN ABSTRACT OF THE PROCEEDINGS RECORDING ALL PERTINENT FACTS SHALL BE KEPT FOR THE PURPOSE OF FACILITATING SUBSEQUENT REVIEW. THE PROCEDURE SHALL BE KEPT AS INFORMAL AS IS CONSISTENT WITH AN ORDERLY PRESENTATION OF THE CASE. SUCH HEARINGS SHALL BE CONDUCTED DURING THE REGULAR WORKING HOURS OF THE AGENCY UNLESS EXTENDED AT THE WILL OF THE COMMITTEE.

(D) AT THE COMPLETION OF ITS REVIEW OF THE CASE, THE COMMITTEE SHALL PREPARE A SUMMARY OF THE HEARING AND SHALL RECOMMEND A DECISION TO THE ORGANIZATION HEAD. IN THE EVENT OF DISAGREEMENT AS TO RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF THE CASE, A DISSENTING RECOMMENDATION MAY BE MADE BY A COMMITTEE MEMBER. THE REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE SHALL BE MADE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS AFTER ITS SELECTION.

5. THE ORGANIZATION HEAD WILL CONSIDER AS PROMPTLY AS POSSIBLE THE REPORT, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE HEARING COMMITTEE AND AFTER ITS RECEIPT WILL COMMUNICATE HIS WRITTEN DECISION TO THE EMPLOYEE. IF HE DISAGREES WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE MAJORITY OF THE COMMITTEE, HE SHALL GIVE TO THE EMPLOYEE HIS REASONS THEREFOR. COPIES OF THE DECISION, TOGETHER WITH ALL MATERIAL PERTAINING TO THE CASE, SHALL BE FORWARDED TO THE DIRECTOR OF PERSONNEL OF THE FEDERAL SECURITY AGENCY WHO WILL MAKE SUCH MATERIAL AVAILABLE TO THE APPELLANT AND TO THE SUPERVISORS CONCERNED UPON REQUEST.

6. AN EMPLOYEE MAY REQUEST REVIEW OF HIS GRIEVANCE BY THE FEDERAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATOR UPON A PRESENTATION IN WRITING TO SHOW THAT HIS GRIEVANCE IS (A) ONE OF MAJOR IMPORTANCE, OR (B) THAT AN OPPORTUNITY FOR ADEQUATE PRESENTATION OF THE EMPLOYEE'S APPEAL HAS BEEN DENIED, OR (C) THAT THERE IS NO SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE DECISION, NOT MERELY THAT THE DECISION IS UNSATISFACTORY TO THE EMPLOYEE. IF THE APPEAL IS ACCEPTED, THE DIRECTOR OF PERSONNEL WILL SEEK, BY ANY AND ALL MEANS WHICH HE MAY DEEM NECESSARY, TO OBTAIN A PROMPT AND SATISFACTORY ADJUSTMENT. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE DIRECTOR OF PERSONNEL SHALL BE RENDERED TO THE FEDERAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATOR WITHIN ONE MONTH AFTER RECEIPT OF THE EMPLOYEE'S WRITTEN REQUEST FOR REVIEW. THE ADMINISTRATOR AFTER REVIEWING THE CASE WILL RENDER HIS DECISION.

THE REFERRED-TO CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION DEPARTMENTAL CIRCULAR NO. 251, DATED FEBRUARY 24, 1941, IN ACCORDANCE WITH WHICH THE FOREGOING GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE WAS ISSUED, READS, IN PART, AS FOLLOWS: 5. THE COMMISSION BELIEVES THAT BEFORE A FINAL DECISION RELATIVE TO THE GRIEVANCE IS MADE BY THE HEAD OF THE AGENCY, THE EMPLOYEE SHOULD HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY OF PRESENTING THE MATTER TO EITHER A PERMANENT OR AN AD HOC COMMITTEE, OR BOARD OF REVIEW, WHOSE RECOMMENDATIONS SHOULD BE ADVISORY IN NATURE AND DESIGNED TO GUIDE THE HEAD OF THE AGENCY IN ARRIVING AT A DECISION.

MEMBERSHIP ON THESE COMMITTEES OR BOARDS SHOULD BE CONFINED TO EMPLOYEES OF THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT FOR THOSE FEDERAL AGENCIES NOT IN THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH, THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEES OR BOARDS MAY BE APPOINTED FROM THE AGENCY CONCERNED.

6. THE COMMISSION BELIEVES THAT ANY PLAN SHOULD RECOGNIZE THE RIGHT OF AN EMPLOYEE TO DESIGNATE, IF HE SO DESIRES, A REPRESENTATIVE OR REPRESENTATIVES OF HIS OWN CHOOSING TO PRESENT HIS GRIEVANCE TO THE SUPERVISOR, DIRECTOR OF PERSONNEL, OR ANY OTHER PERSON OR COMMITTEE DESIGNATED BY THE HEAD OF THE AGENCY OR THE DEPARTMENT.

SECTION 3681, REVISED STATUTES, PROVIDES:

NO ACCOUNTING OR DISBURSING OFFICER OF THE GOVERNMENT SHALL ALLOW OR PAY ANY ACCOUNT OR CHARGE WHATEVER, GROWING OUT OF, OR IN ANY WAY CONNECTED WITH, ANY COMMISSION OR INQUIRY, EXCEPT COURTS-MARTIAL OR COURTS OF INQUIRY IN THE MILITARY OR NAVAL SERVICE OF THE UNITED STATES, UNTIL SPECIAL APPROPRIATIONS SHALL HAVE BEEN MADE BY LAW TO PAY SUCH ACCOUNTS AND CHARGES. * * *

SECTION 9 OF THE ACT OF MARCH 4, 1909, 35 STAT. 1027, PROVIDES:

THAT HEREAFTER NO PART OF THE PUBLIC MONEYS, OR OF ANY APPROPRIATION HERETOFORE OR HEREAFTER MADE BY CONGRESS, SHALL BE USED FOR THE PAYMENT OF COMPENSATION OR EXPENSES OF ANY COMMISSION, COUNCIL, BOARD, OR OTHER SIMILAR BODY, UNLESS THE CREATION OF THE SAME SHALL BE OR SHALL HAVE BEEN AUTHORIZED BY LAW; NOR SHALL THERE BE EMPLOYED BY DETAIL, HEREAFTER OR HERETOFORE MADE, OR OTHERWISE PERSONAL SERVICES FROM ANY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OR OTHER GOVERNMENT ESTABLISHMENT IN CONNECTION WITH ANY SUCH COMMISSION, COUNCIL, BOARD, OR OTHER SIMILAR BODY.

IN DECISION OF FEBRUARY 27, 1932, 11 COMP. GEN. 331, 332, AFTER QUOTING THE ABOVE STATUTES, IT WAS STATED:

THE PURPOSE AND EFFECT OF THESE STATUTES IS TO PROHIBIT THE INCURRING OR PAYING OF EXPENSES INCIDENT TO CONDUCTING INQUIRIES OR THE CREATION OF COMMISSIONS, COUNCILS, BOARDS, OR SIMILAR BODIES BY THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF THE GOVERNMENT THROUGH ITS INHERENT POWER TO MAKE APPOINTMENTS AND INCUR EXPENSES, UNLESS SPECIFIC LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY FOR SUCH INQUIRY, COMMISSION, COUNCIL, BOARD, OR SIMILAR BODY IS FIRST GRANTED BY APPROPRIATION OR OTHERWISE. 5 COMP. GEN. 417; ID. 553; 6 COMP. GEN. 140.

IT IS UNDERSTOOD FROM THE TERMS OF PARAGRAPH 4 (A) OF PERSONNEL BULLETIN NO. 5, ABOVE QUOTED, THAT THE SPECIAL HEARING COMMITTEE HAS NO INDEPENDENT AUTHORITY BUT SERVES ONLY IN AN ADVISORY CAPACITY TO THE PERSONNEL OFFICER OR THE HEAD OF THE AGENCY. HOWEVER, MEMBERSHIP ON THE HEARING COMMITTEE IS NOT PROPOSED TO BE LIMITED TO THE PERSONNEL OF THE FEDERAL SECURITY AGENCY, THE ONLY CONDITION BEING THAT THE MEMBERS "MUST BE EMPLOYEES OF THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.' IN AN OPINION, DATED APRIL 14, 1909, 27 OP. ATTY. GEN. 300, 307 THE ATTORNEY GENERAL STATED, WTTH REGARD TO SECTION 9 OF THE ACT OF MARCH 4, 1909, SUPRA, AS FOLLOWS:

* * * I CANNOT CONCEIVE THAT IT COULD EVER BE CONSTRUED TO PROHIBIT THE HEAD OF A DEPARTMENT FROM SUBMITTING TO THE CONCURRENT INVESTIGATION AND REPORT OF SEVERAL EMPLOYEES OF HIS DEPARTMENT, ANY QUESTION WHICH HE MIGHT SUBMIT FOR INVESTIGATION TO ANY ONE OF THEM. * * * SEE, ALSO, 37 OP. ATTY. GEN. 484. THE SAID ACT OF MARCH 4, 1909, SPECIFICALLY PROHIBITS THE EMPLOYMENT BY DETAIL OR OTHERWISE OF SERVICES FROM ANY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OR OTHER GOVERNMENT ESTABLISHMENT IN CONNECTION WITH ANY SUCH COMMISSION, COUNCIL, BOARD OR OTHER SIMILAR BODY. ACCORDINGLY, IN THE ABSENCE OF SPECIFIC AUTHORITY OF LAW, A COMMITTEE TO HEAR THE GRIEVANCES OF EMPLOYEES OF THE FEDERAL SECURITY AGENCY, THE MEMBERSHIP OF WHICH INCLUDES EMPLOYEES OF FEDERAL AGENCIES OTHER THAN THE FEDERAL SECURITY AGENCY, WOULD CONTRAVENE THE PROVISIONS OF THAT STATUTE. COMPARE DECISION OF JUNE 22, 1940, B 10845.

THE HEARING OF LEGITIMATE GRIEVANCES OF EMPLOYEES AS AUTHORIZED BY EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 7916 ISSUED JUNE 24, 1938, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY VESTED IN THE PRESIDENT, WOULD APPEAR TO CONSTITUTE OFFICIAL BUSINESS, AND, THEREFORE, THE TRAVELING EXPENSE APPROPRIATION WOULD BE AVAILABLE FOR REIMBURSING THE PERSONNEL OF THE FEDERAL SECURITY AGENCY FOR TRAVELING EXPENSES PROPERLY INCURRED INCIDENT TO SUCH OFFICIAL BUSINESS. HOWEVER, THE APPROPRIATION WOULD NOT BE AVAILABLE FOR THE TRAVELING EXPENSES OF PERSONNEL OF OTHER FEDERAL AGENCIES OR OF PERSONS NOT IN THE FEDERAL SERVICE.

YOU ARE ADVISED, THEREFORE, THAT THE APPROPRIATION FOR TRAVELING EXPENSES FOR THE FEDERAL SECURITY AGENCY WOULD BE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT OF TRAVELING EXPENSES OF THE CLASSES OF PERSONS DESIGNATED IN YOUR LETTER AS 1, 2A, 3A, 4, 5, 6A, 7A I, AND 8, BUT WOULD NOT BE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT OF TRAVELING EXPENSES OF CLASSES DESIGNATED AS 2B, 3B AND C, 6B AND C, OR 7A II. ..END :

GAO Contacts

Office of Public Affairs