Debarment for Violation of the Davis-Bacon Act Was Appropriate

B-189471: Apr 10, 1978

Additional Materials:

Contact:

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

Reconsideration was requested of a company's debarment for violation of the Davis-Bacon Act. The debarment was appropriate because: the company deliberately concealed underpayment of wages, and its agreement with employees and later restitution did not make its action one of good faith; a "not guilty" verdict in a related criminal case was not relevant; Congress provided for a 3-year debarment for violation of the act; and procedural due process was not violated in the debarment proceedings in spite of lack of legal representation and cross-examination. The question of whether the debarment provision of the act is unconstitutional is a matter for court determination.

Oct 18, 2017

Oct 17, 2017

Oct 13, 2017

Oct 12, 2017

Oct 11, 2017

  • Daekee Global Company, Ltd.
    We dismiss the protest because the protester has not established that it is an interested party.
    B-414899,B-414899.2

Oct 10, 2017

Looking for more? Browse all our products here