Skip to main content

B-136452, JUL. 11, 1958

B-136452 Jul 11, 1958
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

ATTORNEYS AT LAW: REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTER OF MAY 26. THE RECORD SHOWS THAT THERE IS NOW PENDING IN THE COURT OF CLAIMS A PETITION NO. 230-58. ARE ALSO FOR CONSIDERATION BY THE COURT OF CLAIMS ON PETITION NO. 230-58. FINAL ACTION WILL NOT BE TAKEN BY US ON THE CLAIM WHICH YOU HAVE PRESENTED HERE UNTIL THE CONCLUSION OF THE JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS NOW PENDING IN THE COURT OF CLAIMS ON THE ABOVE PETITION.

View Decision

B-136452, JUL. 11, 1958

TO EMERY AND WOOD, ATTORNEYS AT LAW:

REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTER OF MAY 26, 1958, PRESENTING A CLAIM ON BEHALF OF CAPTAIN HARVEY S. HAISLIP, U.S. NAVY, RETIRED (OUR CLAIM FILE Z- 1890816), FOR ADDITIONAL RETIRED PAY FOR THE PERIOD MAY 1, 1948, TO APRIL 30, 1952, REPRESENTING THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 75 PERCENT OF THE ACTIVE- DUTY PAY OF A CAPTAIN WITH OVER 30 YEARS' SERVICE UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE PAY READJUSTMENT ACT OF 1942, AND THAT WHICH HE HAS BEEN PAID FOR THE PERIOD MAY 1, 1948, TO APRIL 30, 1952.

THE RECORD SHOWS THAT THERE IS NOW PENDING IN THE COURT OF CLAIMS A PETITION NO. 230-58, FILED MAY 23, 1958, IN THE CASE OF HARVEY S. HAISLIP V. UNITED STATES, FOR ADDITIONAL RETIRED PAY COMPUTED ON THE ABOVE BASIS FROM MAY 1, 1952, TO DATE OF JUDGMENT.

THE STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED AND THE ISSUES PRESENTED IN THE CLAIM FOR THE PERIOD MAY 1, 1948, TO APRIL 30, 1952, NOW BEFORE THIS OFFICE, ARE ALSO FOR CONSIDERATION BY THE COURT OF CLAIMS ON PETITION NO. 230-58. ACCORDINGLY, FINAL ACTION WILL NOT BE TAKEN BY US ON THE CLAIM WHICH YOU HAVE PRESENTED HERE UNTIL THE CONCLUSION OF THE JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS NOW PENDING IN THE COURT OF CLAIMS ON THE ABOVE PETITION.

GAO Contacts

Office of Public Affairs