B-133711, NOV. 12, 1957

B-133711: Nov 12, 1957

Additional Materials:

Contact:

Edda Emmanuelli Perez
(202) 512-2853
EmmanuelliPerezE@gao.gov

 

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

HUDSON: REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTER OF OCTOBER 15. ARE TO THE EFFECT THAT YOU RECEIVED NO PART OF THE PROCEEDS OF THE FAMILY ALLOWANCE CHECKS AND THAT YOU RECEIVED ONLY $800 FROM THE SALE OF THE CAR. - AND THAT NO PART OF THE AMOUNT WAS TO BE APPLIED ON ANY ACCOUNT. DEMAND IS BEING MADE ON HER FOR PAYMENT OF THE AMOUNT INVOLVED. IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO TAKE SUCH FURTHER ACTION AS MAY BE APPROPRIATE. THIS IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS A DETERMINATION THAT YOU ARE NOT LIABLE FOR THE AMOUNT OF THE ERRONEOUS PAYMENTS.

B-133711, NOV. 12, 1957

TO MR. IKE G. HUDSON:

REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTER OF OCTOBER 15, 1957, TRANSMITTING AN AFFIDAVIT EXECUTED BY YOU THAT DAY RELATING TO THE ERRONEOUS PAYMENTS OF FAMILY ALLOWANCE MADE TO YOUR FORMER WIFE IN THE AMOUNT OF $550 DURING THE PERIOD OCTOBER 1943 THROUGH AUGUST 1944, AFTER YOU HAD BEEN PROMOTED TO STAFF SERGEANT, AN INELIGIBLE GRADE FOR FAMILY ALLOWANCE UNDER THE SERVICEMEN'S DEPENDENTS ALLOWANCE ACT OF 1942, 56 STAT. 381.

IN OUR LETTER OF OCTOBER 8, 1957, WE REQUESTED YOU TO FURNISH CERTAIN INFORMATION, PARTICULARLY WITH REFERENCE TO WHETHER YOU RECEIVED ANY PART OF THE PROCEEDS OF THE FAMILY ALLOWANCE CHECKS INVOLVED AND, ALSO, AS TO WHETHER YOU RECEIVED THE SUM OF $1,350 FROM THE SALE OF AN AUTOMOBILE, AS ALLEGED BY YOUR FORMER WIFE. YOUR ANSWERS TO THE FOREGOING, AS SET FORTH IN YOUR AFFIDAVIT, ARE TO THE EFFECT THAT YOU RECEIVED NO PART OF THE PROCEEDS OF THE FAMILY ALLOWANCE CHECKS AND THAT YOU RECEIVED ONLY $800 FROM THE SALE OF THE CAR--- NOT THE SUM OF $1,350 REPORTED BY YOUR FORMER WIFE AS HAVING BEEN THE SALE PRICE OF THE CAR--- AND THAT NO PART OF THE AMOUNT WAS TO BE APPLIED ON ANY ACCOUNT.

SINCE YOU ALLEGE, IN EFFECT, THAT YOU DID NOT SHARE IN THE PROCEEDS OF THE CHECKS NOR ENTER INTO A PROPERTY SETTLEMENT WITH YOUR FORMER WIFE UNDER WHICH YOU AGREED TO LIQUIDATE THE INDEBTEDNESS, DEMAND IS BEING MADE ON HER FOR PAYMENT OF THE AMOUNT INVOLVED. HOWEVER, SHOULD SHE PRODUCE EVIDENCE ESTABLISHING YOUR LIABILITY IN THE MATTER, IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO TAKE SUCH FURTHER ACTION AS MAY BE APPROPRIATE. HENCE, THIS IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS A DETERMINATION THAT YOU ARE NOT LIABLE FOR THE AMOUNT OF THE ERRONEOUS PAYMENTS.

Sep 27, 2016

Sep 22, 2016

Sep 21, 2016

Sep 20, 2016

Looking for more? Browse all our products here