B-133507, NOV. 15, 1957

B-133507: Nov 15, 1957

Additional Materials:

Contact:

Edda Emmanuelli Perez
(202) 512-2853
EmmanuelliPerezE@gao.gov

 

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

ATTORNEY AT LAW: THERE IS PRESENTED IN YOUR LETTER OF JULY 22. YOUR REQUEST IS BASED ON THE HOLDING IN THE DECISION RENDERED JULY 12. OUR VIEW RESPECTING THE SCOPE OF THE COURT'S DECISION IN THE HEDDEN CASE WAS EXPLAINED IN OUR DECISION TO YOU. YOUR ATTENTION WAS DIRECTED TO THE FACT THAT UNDER THE COURT'S DECISION OF JULY 12. WAS ALLOWED TO INCLUDE. YOUR ATTENTION ALSO WAS DIRECTED TO THE FACT THAT NO PART OF HEDDEN'S INACTIVE NATIONAL GUARD SERVICE WAS INCLUDED OR AUTHORIZED BY THE COURT TO BE INCLUDED IN DETERMINING THE "ACTIVE SERVICE" FACTOR FOR THE PURPOSE OF COMPUTING HIS RETIRED PAY IN THE MANNER PRESCRIBED IN METHOD (B) OF SECTION 511. LIEUTENANT COLONEL WINFIELD IS ENTITLED TO RECEIVE RETIRED PAY EFFECTIVE FROM OCTOBER 1.

B-133507, NOV. 15, 1957

TO MR. ROBERT F. KLEPINGER, ATTORNEY AT LAW:

THERE IS PRESENTED IN YOUR LETTER OF JULY 22, 1957, YOUR REQUEST, AS ATTORNEY FOR LIEUTENANT COLONEL RICHARD M. WINFIELD, U.S. ARMY, RETIRED, THAT WE RECONSIDER AND REVIEW THE ACTION TAKEN IN GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE SETTLEMENT DATED OCTOBER 27, 1954, DISALLOWING HIS CLAIM FOR ADDITIONAL RETIRED PAY, EFFECTIVE FROM OCTOBER 1, 1949, UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 511 OF THE CAREER COMPENSATION ACT OF 1949, 63 STAT. 829, AS AMENDED. YOUR REQUEST IS BASED ON THE HOLDING IN THE DECISION RENDERED JULY 12, 1957, BY THE COURT OF CLAIMS IN THE CASE OF WILLIS A. HEDDEN V. UNITED STATES, C.CLS. NO. 156-55.

OUR VIEW RESPECTING THE SCOPE OF THE COURT'S DECISION IN THE HEDDEN CASE WAS EXPLAINED IN OUR DECISION TO YOU, B-119312, OCTOBER 14, 1957, ON THE CLAIM OF MAJOR PRICE BEEBE, U.S. ARMY, RETIRED. YOUR ATTENTION WAS DIRECTED TO THE FACT THAT UNDER THE COURT'S DECISION OF JULY 12, 1957, THE PLAINTIFF, HEDDEN, WAS ALLOWED TO INCLUDE, FOR THE PURPOSE OF DETERMINING THE "ACTIVE SERVICE" FACTOR TO BE USED IN COMPUTING HIS RETIRED PAY UNDER METHOD (B), SECTION 511 OF THE 1949 LAW, ONLY THAT PORTION OF HIS NATIONAL GUARD SERVICE PRIOR TO JUNE 3, 1916, WHICH REPRESENTED THE THREE TEN-DAY PERIODS OF ACTIVE DUTY TRAINING THAT HE PERFORMED UNDER AUTHORITY OF THE DICK ACT OF 1903. YOUR ATTENTION ALSO WAS DIRECTED TO THE FACT THAT NO PART OF HEDDEN'S INACTIVE NATIONAL GUARD SERVICE WAS INCLUDED OR AUTHORIZED BY THE COURT TO BE INCLUDED IN DETERMINING THE "ACTIVE SERVICE" FACTOR FOR THE PURPOSE OF COMPUTING HIS RETIRED PAY IN THE MANNER PRESCRIBED IN METHOD (B) OF SECTION 511.

IN THE INSTANT CASE, IT APPEARS THAT LIEUTENANT COLONEL WINFIELD HAS 26 YEARS, 4 MONTHS, AND 6 DAYS' ACTIVE SERVICE AND, IN ADDITION THERETO, APPROXIMATELY 3 YEARS, 6 MONTHS, AND 8 DAYS' INACTIVE SERVICE, MAKING A TOTAL OF OVER 29 CUMULATIVE YEARS OF SERVICE IN DETERMINING THE RATE OF HIS MONTHLY BASIC PAY FOR THE PURPOSE OF COMPUTING HIS RETIRED PAY UNDER METHOD (B), SECTION 511 OF THE CAREER COMPENSATION ACT OF 1949. UNDER THE RULE OF THE HEDDEN DECISION OF JULY 12, 1957, AND USING THE FORMULA PRESCRIBED IN METHOD (B) OF SECTION 511, LIEUTENANT COLONEL WINFIELD IS ENTITLED TO RECEIVE RETIRED PAY EFFECTIVE FROM OCTOBER 1, 1949, AT THE RATE OF 2 1/2 PERCENTUM OF THE MONTHLY BASIC PAY OF A LIEUTENANT COLONEL WITH OVER 26 BUT NOT OVER 30 CUMULATIVE YEARS OF SERVICE TIMES 26 (REPRESENTING HIS "ACTIVE SERVICE" FACTOR). THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY REPORTS THAT LIEUTENANT COLONEL WINFIELD HAS BEEN PAID RETIRED PAY COMPUTED ON THAT BASIS UNDER AUTHORITY OF SECTION 511, EFFECTIVE FROM OCTOBER 1, 1949.

YOU DO NOT ALLEGE IN YOUR LETTER OF JULY 22, 1957, THAT LIEUTENANT COLONEL WINFIELD HAD ANY PERIOD OR PERIODS OF ACTIVE SERVICE IN THE NATIONAL GUARD FOR WHICH HE HAS NOT BEEN GIVEN FULL CREDIT IN THE COMPUTATION OF HIS RETIRED PAY EFFECTIVE FROM OCTOBER 1, 1949. ACCORDINGLY, THE DISALLOWANCE OF HIS CLAIM IN GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE SETTLEMENT DATED OCTOBER 27, 1954, IS SUSTAINED.