Budget and Spending:

Financial and Legal Issues Facing the United Mine Workers of America Combined Benefit Fund

AIMD-00-280R: Published: Aug 15, 2000. Publicly Released: Aug 15, 2000.

Contact:

Gloria L. Jarmon
(202) 512-3000
contact@gao.gov

 

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the United Mine Workers of America (UMWA) Combined Benefit Fund, focusing on: (1) the status of the Fund's financial position and its financing mechanism; (2) the impact of major court decisions on the assignment of beneficiaries; and (3) significant litigation and its related costs.

GAO noted that: (1) the Fund has been experiencing financial difficulties due to rising costs and a financing mechanism that has been negatively affected by recent court decisions; (2) according to the Fund's September 30, 1999, audited financial statements, the Fund had a cumulative deficit of $12.2 million; (3) the Fund's actuary estimates that the cumulative operating deficit will increase to approximately $513 million by 2008; (4) in addition, the actuarial projection includes borrowing costs of $101 million during the same time frame, which results in a total deficit of $614 million; (5) the Fund is involved in extensive litigation arising from the Coal Act and normal business operations; (6) Fund officials classified their significant litigation into seven major categories: (a) constitutional cases; (b) Dixie Fuel court cases; (c) companies challenging assessments; (d) premium rate cases; (e) bankruptcy cases; (f) successorship cases; and (g) Evergreen cases; (7) Eastern Enterprises v. Apfel (1998) and Dixie Fuel Company v. Social Security Administration (1999) are two of the significant cases that have affected or may affect the assignment of beneficiaries; (8) Eastern resulted in approximately 8,000 beneficiary reassignments; (9) Dixie Fuel, which has not yet been implemented, could potentially result in the reassignment of 10,000 beneficiaries; and (10) the Fund has incurred legal costs of over $11 million for all significant cases since its inception.

Mar 27, 2014

Mar 6, 2014

Feb 20, 2014

Jan 24, 2014

Oct 29, 2013

Sep 30, 2013

Sep 26, 2013

Jul 29, 2013

Jul 24, 2013

Jul 10, 2013

Looking for more? Browse all our products here