Stronger Federal Effort Needed To Foster Private Sector Productivity

AFMD-81-29: Published: Feb 18, 1981. Publicly Released: Feb 18, 1981.

Additional Materials:

Contact:

Brian L. Usilaner
(202) 275-5818
contact@gao.gov

 

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

U.S. productivity growth has declined dramatically over the past 12 years. In the past 3 years, it has virtually ceased. Recognizing the importance of productivity, the President established the National Productivity Council and assigned private sector productivity responsibilities to the Departments of Labor and Commerce. The Council was to guide and coordinate these and other Federal efforts to improve productivity and to serve as the Government's primary contact with the private sector on productivity issues. GAO examined the effectiveness of the Council regarding private sector productivity.

GAO found that, in over 2 years of existence, the National Productivity Council has been relatively inactive and has largely ignored the functions assigned to it. It has seldom met, has not provided guidance to Federal productivity programs, and has not become recognized as the Government's productivity focal point. The Department of Labor did not act on its leadership responsibilities. The Department of Commerce undertook significant productivity initiatives despite the Council's lack of involvement. The national productivity effort has been ineffective because it lacked support from the executive branch. As a result: (1) Federal programs directly related to productivity improvement are funded and operated without any central review, direction, coordination, or evaluation; (2) there is no recognized spokesperson for productivity concerns; and (3) there is no open channel for airing private sector problems and concerns about productivity related policies. An organization should be established to: (1) provide central review and coordination of Federal programs directed at productivity improvement; (2) provide a productivity perspective in economic and budgetary decisionmaking; (3) provide an open and nonthreatening channel for private sector problems and concerns about productivity-related policies; and (4) develop a national productivity plan outlining what the Federal Government is doing and should be doing to increase productivity.

Matter for Congressional Consideration

  1. Status: Closed - Not Implemented

    Comments: Further action on this subject will await the findings and recommendations of the planned White House Conference on Productivity.

    Matter: Congress should enact legislation to establish a National Productivity Council with a full-time, presidentially appointed chairperson and with its own budget authorization. The main functon of the Council would be to prepare, with the involvement of private sector representatives, a national productivity plan. The substance of such an organization is included in S. 2417, a bill introduced in the 96th Congress that incorporates previous GAO recommendations.

 

Explore the full database of GAO's Open Recommendations »

Sep 7, 2016

Aug 10, 2016

Jul 14, 2016

May 26, 2016

Apr 14, 2016

Apr 11, 2016

Mar 21, 2016

Feb 8, 2016

Jan 27, 2016

Nov 16, 2015

Looking for more? Browse all our products here