Pemco Aeroplex, Inc.

B-310372: Dec 27, 2007

Additional Materials:

Contact:

Ralph O. White
(202) 512-8278
WhiteRO@gao.gov

Kenneth E. Patton
(202) 512-8205
PattonK@gao.gov

 

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

Pemco Aeroplex, Inc. protests the Department of the Air Force's award of a contract to Boeing Aerospace Operations, Inc. pursuant to request for proposals (RFP) No. FA8105-05-R-0014 to provide programmed depot maintenance (PDM) for KC-135 aircraft. Pemco maintains that the agency's evaluation of proposals was flawed with regard to past performance, mission capability, and cost/price, and that the agency failed to properly consider alleged organizational conflicts of interest (OCI) and an alleged violation of the procurement integrity provisions of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act, 41 U.S.C. 423 (2000).

We sustain the protest with regard to the agency's evaluation of cost/price, but we deny the challenges to the agency's evaluation of past performance and mission capability, as well as to alleged OCIs and the alleged violation of procurement integrity provisions.

The page or item that you are looking for could not be found on this site. It may have been relocated, removed or be temporarily unavailable. Please make sure that you have entered the address correctly. If you got here following a link, please let us know.

You may use the GAO Sitemap to find what you were looking for; you may search for your document using the full text search engine below; or you may click the 'back' button to go back to the page you came from.

You may also try to search for your document by using the full text search engine below.

Apr 20, 2017

Apr 19, 2017

Apr 18, 2017

Apr 17, 2017

Apr 14, 2017

  • Anders Construction, Inc.
    We deny the protest.
    B-414261
  • ICF Incorporated, LLC
    We deny the protest.
    B-414247,B-414247.3,B-414247.5
  • Planning & Learning Technologies, Inc.--Advisory Opinion
    On July 19, we dismissed Paltech's protest, and several others, when another offeror under the solicitation submitted a protest to the United States Court of Federal Claims. Bid Protest Regulations, 4 C.F.R. 21.11(b) (2016). On August 1, the Department of Justice filed a motion with the court requesting an advisory opinion from our Office. The court granted the motion and requested that our Office issue an advisory opinion regarding the merits of the protest Paltech filed with our Office. See id. Our opinion here is issued in response to the court's request, and is presented in the same general format as we normally employ to issue decisions responding to bid protests. Our Office finds the protest without merit, and we would deny this protest.
    B-413156.23
  • The Arbinger Company--Advisory Opinion
    On July 19, we dismissed Arbinger's protest, and several others, when another offeror under the solicitation submitted a protest to the United States Court of Federal Claims. Bid Protest Regulations, 4 C.F.R. 21.11(b) (2016). On August 5, the parties (Arbinger and the Department of Justice) filed a joint motion with the court requesting an advisory opinion from our Office. The court granted the motion and requested that our Office provide an advisory opinion regarding the merits of the protest Arbinger filed with our Office. See id. Our opinion here is issued in response to the court's request, and is presented in the same general format as we normally employ to issue decisions responding to bid protests. Our Office finds the protest without merit, and we would deny this protest.
    B-413156.21

Looking for more? Browse all our products here