Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Occupational Dose Records, Labeling Containers, and the Total Effective Dose Equivalent
Highlights
GAO reviewed the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) new rule on occupational dose records, labeling containers, and the total effective dose equivalent. GAO found that (1) the final rule amends the definition of Total Effective Dose Equivalent by limiting the routine reporting of annual doses to those workers whose annual dose exceeds a specific dose threshold or who request a report, modifies the labeling requirements for certain containers holding licensed material, and removes the requirement that licensees attempt to obtain cumulative exposure records for workers unless those workers are being authorized to receive planned special exposure; and (2) with the exception of the required delay in the effective date, NRC complied with the applicable requirements in promulgating the rule.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Occupational Dose Records, Labeling Containers, and the Total Effective Dose Equivalent, GAO-08-332R, December 17, 2007
The Honorable Barbara Boxer
Chairman
The Honorable James M. Inhofe
Ranking Minority Member
Committee on Environment and Public Works
The Honorable John D. Dingell
Chairman
The Honorable Joe Barton
Ranking Minority Member
Committee on Energy and Commerce
House of Representatives
Subject: Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Occupational Dose Records, Labeling Containers, and the Total Effective Dose Equivalent
Pursuant to section 801(a)(2)(A) of title 5, United States Code, this is our report on a major rule promulgated by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), entitled Occupational Dose Records, Labeling Containers, and the Total Effective Dose Equivalent (RIN: 3150-AH40). We received the rule on
The final rule amends the definition of Total Effective Dose Equivalent and limits the routine reporting of annual doses to those workers whose annual dose exceeds a specific dose threshold or who request a report. This final rule also modifies the labeling requirements for certain containers holding licensed material within posted areas in nuclear power facilities. Further, this rule removes the requirement that licensees attempt to obtain cumulative exposure records for workers unless those workers are being authorized to receive planned special exposure.
Enclosed is our assessment of the NRC's compliance with the procedural steps required by section 801(a)(1)(B)(i) through (iv) of title 5 with respect to the rule. The Congressional Review Act requires major rules to take effect no earlier than 60 days from the later of the rule's publication in the Federal Register or receipt by Congress. 5 U.S.C. sect. 801(a)(3)(A). This rule was published and received on
If you have any questions about this report, please contact Michael R. Volpe, Assistant General Counsel, at (202) 512-8236. The official responsible for GAO evaluation work relating to the subject matter of the rule is Robert Robinson, Managing Director, Natural Resources and Environment. Mr. Robinson can be reached at (202) 512-3841.
signed
Robert J. Cramer
Associate General Counsel
Enclosure
cc: Rebecca L. Schmidt
Office Director
Office of Congressional Relations
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
ENCLOSURE
REPORT UNDER 5 U.S.C. sect. 801(a)(2)(A) ON A MAJOR RULE
ISSUED BY THE
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
ENTITLED
"OCCUPATIONAL DOSE RECORDS, LABELING CONTAINERS, AND
THE TOTAL EFFECTIVE DOSE EQUIVALENT"
(RIN: 3150-AH40)
(i) Cost-benefit analysis
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) prepared a regulatory analysis of this final rule. NRC determined that the total implementation cost to NRC of this final rule will be $68,000. NRC estimates that the total operating impact on the NRC will be between $650,000 and $980,000 and on Agreement States will be between $1.9 million and $2.7 million. NRC concluded that the net present value of this rule is between $135 million and $237 million. NRC also estimated that the total reduction in the annual burden as a result of this rule will be 132,000 hours.
(ii) Agency actions relevant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. sections 603–605, 607, and 609
NRC determined that this final rule will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities.
(iii) Agency actions relevant to sections 202-205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. sections 1532–1535
As an independent regulatory agency, NRC is not subject to title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act.
(iv) Other relevant information or requirements under acts and executive orders
Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. sections 551 et seq.
NRC promulgated this rule under the notice-and-comment procedures found in the Administrative Procedures Act. 5 U.S.C. sect. 553. NRC published a proposed rulemaking on
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. sections 3501–3520
This final rule contains information collection requirements subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Act. OMB approved the requirements with OMB numbers 3150-0044, 3150-0014, 3150-0011, and 3150-0005. NRC expects this final rule to reduce the paperwork burden.
Statutory authorization for the rule
NCR promulgated this final rule under the authority found in sections 2014, 2021, 2021b, 2073, 2093, 2095, 2111, 2131–35, 2138, 2201, 2232, 2233, 2235, 2236, 2239, 2282, 2297f, 4332, 5841, 5842, 5846, 5851, and 5891 of title 42, United States Code, and section 3504 note of title 44, United States Code.