CBMC, Inc.

B-295586: Jan 6, 2005

Additional Materials:

Contact:

Ralph O. White
(202) 512-8278
WhiteRO@gao.gov

Kenneth E. Patton
(202) 512-8205
PattonK@gao.gov

 

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

CBMC, Inc. protests the award of a contract to Graebel Movers by the Corporation for National and Community Service under solicitation No. HQKMR0507 for relocation and moving services for its AmeriCorps*NCCC Central Regional Campus.

We dismiss the protest as untimely.

B-295586, CBMC, Inc., January 6, 2005

Decision

Matter of: CBMC, Inc.

File: B-295586

Date: January 6, 2005

Jerry Seymore for the protester.

Andrea Grill, Esq., Corporation for National and Community Service, for the agency.

Kenneth Kilgour, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, participated in the preparation of the decision.

DIGEST

Protest is dismissed as untimely, where prospective contractors received constructive notice of the protested contract award when that award was posted on the FedBizOpps Internet site, and the protest was filed more than 10 days after the award posting.

DECISION

CBMC, Inc. protests the award of a contract to Graebel Movers by the Corporation for National and Community Service under solicitation No. HQKMR0507 for relocation and moving services for its AmeriCorps*NCCC Central Regional Campus.

We dismiss the protest as untimely because it was filed more than 10 calendar days after the protester knew, or should have known, of the basis for its protest.

Our Bid Protest Regulations contain strict rules for the timely submission of protests. These rules require that a protest based on other than alleged improprieties in a solicitation be filed, either with the agency or our Office, no later than 10 calendar days after the protester knew, or should have known, the basis for protest, whichever is earlier. 4 C.F.R. 21.2(a)(2) (2004). Our timeliness rules reflect the dual requirements of giving parties a fair opportunity to present their cases and resolving protests expeditiously without unduly disrupting or delaying the procurement process. Peacock, Myers & Adams , B-279327, Mar. 24, 1998, 98-1 CPD 94 at 3-4.

According to the FedBizOpps Internet site, and as confirmed by the agency, notice of the contract award was posted on www.fedbizopps.gov on December 17, 2004. Publication of the award at the FedBizOpps Internet site put prospective contractors, including CBMC, Inc., on constructive notice of the award on that date. See Specialty Marine, Inc. , B292053, May 19, 2003, 2003 CPD 106 at 2, recon. denied , B-292053.2, July 29, 2003, 2003 CPD 135. CBMC's protest had to be filed no later than close of business December 27 in order to be timely; a protest is considered "filed" on a particular day under our rules when it is received by our Office by 5:30 p.m. on that day, 4 C.F.R. 21.0(g), and we did not receive CBMC's protest until after 9 p.m. on December 27. Therefore, CBMC's protest is untimely and will not be considered.

The protest is dismissed.

Anthony H. Gamboa

General Counsel

Apr 20, 2017

Apr 19, 2017

Apr 18, 2017

Apr 17, 2017

Apr 14, 2017

  • Anders Construction, Inc.
    We deny the protest.
    B-414261
  • ICF Incorporated, LLC
    We deny the protest.
    B-414247,B-414247.3,B-414247.5
  • Planning & Learning Technologies, Inc.--Advisory Opinion
    On July 19, we dismissed Paltech's protest, and several others, when another offeror under the solicitation submitted a protest to the United States Court of Federal Claims. Bid Protest Regulations, 4 C.F.R. 21.11(b) (2016). On August 1, the Department of Justice filed a motion with the court requesting an advisory opinion from our Office. The court granted the motion and requested that our Office issue an advisory opinion regarding the merits of the protest Paltech filed with our Office. See id. Our opinion here is issued in response to the court's request, and is presented in the same general format as we normally employ to issue decisions responding to bid protests. Our Office finds the protest without merit, and we would deny this protest.
    B-413156.23
  • The Arbinger Company--Advisory Opinion
    On July 19, we dismissed Arbinger's protest, and several others, when another offeror under the solicitation submitted a protest to the United States Court of Federal Claims. Bid Protest Regulations, 4 C.F.R. 21.11(b) (2016). On August 5, the parties (Arbinger and the Department of Justice) filed a joint motion with the court requesting an advisory opinion from our Office. The court granted the motion and requested that our Office provide an advisory opinion regarding the merits of the protest Arbinger filed with our Office. See id. Our opinion here is issued in response to the court's request, and is presented in the same general format as we normally employ to issue decisions responding to bid protests. Our Office finds the protest without merit, and we would deny this protest.
    B-413156.21

Looking for more? Browse all our products here