Skip to main content

Matter of: Payment by National Guard to Western Area Power Administration for Damage to Transmission Pole File: B-253291.2 Date: February 14, 1994

B-253291.2 Feb 14, 1994
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

Since WAPA's power operations are wholly consumer-financed and WAPA's customers would ultimately bear the costs of a disallowed claim. WAPA's claim was denied. The doctrine is based on the theory that there can be no reimbursement by the government to itself for damage to or loss of its own property. The interdepartmental waiver doctrine is not applicable. Application of the doctrine would have resulted in BPA customers paying for government-caused damages to BPA property. WAPA's statutory financing scheme is like that of BPA. Is authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1944 to transmit and sell electric power. 16 U.S.C. WAPA finances its operations by charging its customers rates that will cover the costs of producing and transmitting the electric energy.

View Decision

Matter of: Payment by National Guard to Western Area Power Administration for Damage to Transmission Pole File: B-253291.2 Date: February 14, 1994

The Wyoming National Guard has the authority to pay claim made by the Western Area Power Administration (WAPA) for costs of repairing an electrical transmission structure that collapsed when struck by a National Guard truck during training exercises. Since WAPA's power operations are wholly consumer-financed and WAPA's customers would ultimately bear the costs of a disallowed claim, the interdepartmental waiver doctrine does not apply. 71 Comp.Gen. 1 (1991)

DECISION

The interdepartmental waiver doctrine prohibits a federal agency from paying for the use or restoration of real property controlled by another federal agency, unless authorized by statute. 60 Comp.Gen. 406 (1981); 59 Comp.Gen. 93 (1979). The doctrine is based on the theory that there can be no reimbursement by the government to itself for damage to or loss of its own property.

The interdepartmental waiver doctrine is not applicable, however, where this would be inconsistent with the financing scheme of the agency incurring the damage or loss. 71 Comp.Gen. 1 (1991); B-253613, Dec. 3, 1993. In a recent decision, we concluded that the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) could recover the cost of damages to its property caused by another federal agency. We reasoned that the statutory scheme for financing BPA's activities did not envision BPA's ratepayers covering costs generated by actions of other federal agencies wholly unrelated to the services BPA provides its customers. Under these circumstances, application of the doctrine would have resulted in BPA customers paying for government-caused damages to BPA property, not in the government reimbursing itself. 71 Comp.Gen. 1.

WAPA's statutory financing scheme is like that of BPA. WAPA, a bureau within the Department of Energy, is authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1944 to transmit and sell electric power. 16 U.S.C. Sec. 825s (1988). WAPA finances its operations by charging its customers rates that will cover the costs of producing and transmitting the electric energy. The rate schedules are established with the objective of encouraging the most widespread use of electricity at "the lowest possible rates to consumers consistent with sound business principles." Id. WAPA's financing scheme, like BPA's, contemplates that WAPA customers will finance WAPA operations. Application of the interdepartmental waiver doctrine in this case would result not in the government reimbursing itself, but in the government avoiding liability for damages it caused, in effect shifting the cost of paying for the damages from the National Guard to WAPA's customers. Accordingly, the interdepartmental waiver doctrine does not bar the National Guard from reimbursing WAPA for costs resulting from the damage to WAPA's electrical transmission structure.

GAO Contacts

Office of Public Affairs