Skip to main content

B-216868, OCT 31, 1984, 84-2 CPD 493

B-216868 Oct 31, 1984
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

GAO DOES NOT REVIEW AFFIRMATIVE DETERMINATIONS OF RESPONSIBILITY UNLESS THERE HAS BEEN A SHOWING OF POSSIBLE FRAUD OR BAD FAITH ON THE PART OF PROCUREMENT OFFICIALS OR THAT THE SOLICITATION CONTAINS DEFINITIVE RESPONSIBILITY CRITERIA THAT HAVE NOT BEEN APPLIED. AN ALLEGATION THAT A SMALL BUSINESS CONTRACTOR WILL SUBCONTRACT THE PERFORMANCE OF A CONTRACT TO A LARGE BUSINESS CONTRARY TO THE INTENT OF A SMALL BUSINESS SET-ASIDE IS MATTER OF CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROCURING AGENCY RATHER THAN GAO. SUBCONTRACTING WITH A LARGE BUSINESS UNDER A SERVICE CONTRACT SET- ASIDE FOR SMALL BUSINESS IS NOT LEGALLY OBJECTIONABLE. THE PROTESTER CONTENDS THAT THE AWARDEE DID NOT HAVE THE FACILITIES TO PROVIDE THE SUPPLIES OR SERVICES REQUIRED PRIOR TO BEING AWARDED THE CONTRACT.

View Decision

B-216868, OCT 31, 1984, 84-2 CPD 493

CONTRACTORS - RESPONSIBILITY - DETERMINATION - REVIEW BY GAO - AFFIRMATIVE FINDING ACCEPTED DIGEST: 1. THE CAPACITY OF A COMPANY TO PROVIDE SUPPLIES OR SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS CONCERNS A MATTER OF RESPONSIBILITY. GAO DOES NOT REVIEW AFFIRMATIVE DETERMINATIONS OF RESPONSIBILITY UNLESS THERE HAS BEEN A SHOWING OF POSSIBLE FRAUD OR BAD FAITH ON THE PART OF PROCUREMENT OFFICIALS OR THAT THE SOLICITATION CONTAINS DEFINITIVE RESPONSIBILITY CRITERIA THAT HAVE NOT BEEN APPLIED. CONTRACTS - PROTESTS - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION - NOT FOR RESOLUTION BY GAO 2. AN ALLEGATION THAT A SMALL BUSINESS CONTRACTOR WILL SUBCONTRACT THE PERFORMANCE OF A CONTRACT TO A LARGE BUSINESS CONTRARY TO THE INTENT OF A SMALL BUSINESS SET-ASIDE IS MATTER OF CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROCURING AGENCY RATHER THAN GAO. CONTRACTS - SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS - SET-ASIDES - SUBCONTRACTOR, SUPPLIER, ETC. SIZE STATUS 3. SUBCONTRACTING WITH A LARGE BUSINESS UNDER A SERVICE CONTRACT SET- ASIDE FOR SMALL BUSINESS IS NOT LEGALLY OBJECTIONABLE.

MANN RENTAL SERVICE:

MANN RENTAL SERVICE (MANN) PROTESTS THE AWARD OF A CONTRACT TO BIG T ENTERPRISES (BIG T) UNDER SOLICITATION NO. F08620-84-D0002, ISSUES AS A SMALL BUSINESS SET-ASIDE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE FOR LINEN SERVICES. THE PROTESTER CONTENDS THAT THE AWARDEE DID NOT HAVE THE FACILITIES TO PROVIDE THE SUPPLIES OR SERVICES REQUIRED PRIOR TO BEING AWARDED THE CONTRACT, AND THAT, SINCE THE AWARD, HAS SUBCONTRACTED A MAJOR PORTION OF THE CONTRACT TO A COMPANY WHICH DOES NOT QUALIFY AS A SMALL BUSINESS. WE DISMISS THE PROTEST.

MANN'S CLAIM THAT THE AWARDEE LACKS THE ABILITY TO PROVIDE THE LINEN SUPPLIES OR SERVICES REQUIRED BY THE INVITATION FOR BIDS CONCERNS A MATTER OF RESPONSIBILITY. THUS, MANN'S CONTENTION CONSTITUTES A PROTEST AGAINST THE AIR FORCE'S AFFIRMATIVE DETERMINATION OF BIG T'S RESPONSIBILITY WHICH IS NECESSARILY INVOLVED IN ANY DECISION TO AWARD TO BIG T. DIXIE BAG CORP., B-210898.2, JULY 15, 1983, 83-2 CPD PARA. 97. WE DO NOT REVIEW AFFIRMATIVE DETERMINATIONS OF RESPONSIBILITY UNLESS THERE IS A SHOWING OF POSSIBLE FRAUD OR BAD FAITH ON THE PART OF THE PROCURING OFFICIALS OR THAT THE SOLICITATION CONTAINS DEFINITIVE RESPONSIBILITY CRITERIA WHICH HAVE ALLEGEDLY NOT BEEN APPLIED. LAKE SHORE, INC., B-213877, DEC. 22, 1983, 84-1 CPD PARA. 14. NEITHER EXCEPTION APPLIES HERE.

MANN'S ALLEGATION THAT BIG T HAS SUBCONTRACTED A SUBSTANTIAL PORTION OF THE WORK TO A FIRM THAT DOES NOT QUALIFY AS A SMALL BUSINESS IS A MATTER OF CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROCURING AGENCY. THE WENNINGER CO., INC., B-205093.3, AUG. 10, 1983, 83-2 CPD PARA. 194. WE DO NOT CONSIDER SUCH MATTERS UNDER OUR BID PROTEST PROCEDURES, 4 C.F.R. PART 21 (1984), WHICH ARE RESERVED FOR DETERMINING WHETHER AN AWARD OR PROPOSED AWARD OF A CONTRACT COMPLIES WITH STATUTORY, REGULATORY AND OTHER LEGAL REQUIREMENTS. HSQ TECHNOLOGY, B-208557.5, JULY 11, 1983, 83-2 CPD PARA. 69. IN ANY EVENT, WE NOTE THAT IF THE CONTRACT IN QUESTION IS A SERVICE CONTRACT, A SUBCONTRACT WITH A LARGE BUSINESS FIRM IS NOT LEGALLY OBJECTIONABLE. SEE JAMES L. DECKER, B-202051, AUG. 20, 1981, 81-2 CPD PARA. 158.

THE PROTEST IS DISMISSED.

GAO Contacts

Office of Public Affairs