Skip to main content

B-189280, JULY 6, 1977

B-189280 Jul 06, 1977
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

GAO WILL NOT REVIEW GRANTEE'S DETERMINATION AND CONCURRENCE BY GRANTOR AGENCY CONCERNING MISTAKE IN BID WHEN MATERIAL ISSUES INVOLVED ARE BEFORE COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION. WHICH IS NOT THE CASE HERE. THE PROJECT IS SUBJECT TO A FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE CONTRACT BETWEEN MBTA AND THE URBAN MASS TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (UMTA). WAS $9. THE SUM OF THE WRITTEN UNIT PRICES WAS $9. VOLPE CONTENDS THAT THE MISTAKE IN ITS BID WAS CAUSED BY CLERICAL ERROR AND THAT MBTA SHOULD PERMIT VOLPE'S BID TO BE WITHDRAWN. IT IS THE POLICY OF OUR OFFICE NOT TO REVIEW MATTERS WHERE THE MATERIAL ISSUES INVOLVED ARE BEFORE A COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION UNLESS THE COURT EXPRESSES AN INTEREST IN RECEIVING OUR VIEWS.

View Decision

B-189280, JULY 6, 1977

GAO WILL NOT REVIEW GRANTEE'S DETERMINATION AND CONCURRENCE BY GRANTOR AGENCY CONCERNING MISTAKE IN BID WHEN MATERIAL ISSUES INVOLVED ARE BEFORE COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION, UNLESS COURT EXPRESSES INTEREST IN RECEIVING GAO VIEWS, WHICH IS NOT THE CASE HERE.

THE VOLPE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.:

ON MAY 17, 1977, THE VOLPE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. (VOLPE) SUBMITTED A BID IN RESPONSE TO A SOLICITATION ISSUED BY THE MASSACHUSETTS BAY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (MBTA) FOR CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN BUS STORAGE AND MAINTENANCE FACILITIES. THE PROJECT IS SUBJECT TO A FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE CONTRACT BETWEEN MBTA AND THE URBAN MASS TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (UMTA).

VOLPE'S TOTAL BID AS SHOWN ON THE FACESHEET, AS WELL AS THE FINAL SHEET OF THE BID FORM, WAS $9,981,319, RESULTING IN VOLPE BEING THE SECOND LOW BIDDER. LATER MBTA NOTED A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE SUM OF THE WRITTEN UNIT PRICES AND TOTAL BID PRICE. THE SUM OF THE WRITTEN UNIT PRICES WAS $9,498,383, RESULTING IN VOLPE BEING THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER. VOLPE CONTENDS THAT THE MISTAKE IN ITS BID WAS CAUSED BY CLERICAL ERROR AND THAT MBTA SHOULD PERMIT VOLPE'S BID TO BE WITHDRAWN.

WHEN MBTA REFUSED TO ALLOW THE BID TO BE WITHDRAWN, AND UMTA CONCURRED, VOLPE REQUESTED THAT OUR OFFICE REVIEW THE MATTER. SUBSEQUENTLY, IN ORDER TO PREVENT MBTA FROM AWARDING THE CONTRACT TO VOLPE AND PERHAPS REQUIRING VOLPE TO FORFEIT ITS BID BOND IN THE AMOUNT OF $600,000, VOLPE FILED SUIT IN A SUPERIOR COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS AND OBTAINED A RESTRAINING ORDER.

IT IS THE POLICY OF OUR OFFICE NOT TO REVIEW MATTERS WHERE THE MATERIAL ISSUES INVOLVED ARE BEFORE A COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION UNLESS THE COURT EXPRESSES AN INTEREST IN RECEIVING OUR VIEWS, WHICH IS NOT THE CASE HERE. SOVEREIGN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LTD; CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, B-185874, MARCH 8, 1977, 77-1 CPD 168.

ACCORDINGLY, WE WILL TAKE NO FURTHER ACTION ON THE MATTER.

GAO Contacts

Office of Public Affairs