Skip to main content

B-157362, DEC. 20, 1965

B-157362 Dec 20, 1965
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

TO JAMES LEFFEL AND COMPANY: REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTER OF DECEMBER 3. IN THIS REGARD YOU ARE INFORMED THAT DECISIONS ISSUED BY THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES WILL BE RECONSIDERED UPON REQUEST. THIS OFFICE THOROUGHLY REVIEWED THE FACTS AND FINDING IN YOUR CASE AND IT IS OUR OPINION THAT IT WAS PROPERLY DECIDED. IF YOU HAVE ANY NEW EVIDENCE WHICH YOU FEEL IS DETERMINATIVE. IN THE EVENT YOU HAVE NO SUCH PROOF TO PRESENT TO US. WE WILL CONSIDER THAT OUR FILE IN THE MATTER IS CLOSED.

View Decision

B-157362, DEC. 20, 1965

TO JAMES LEFFEL AND COMPANY:

REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTER OF DECEMBER 3, 1965, IN EFFECT REQUESTING REVIEW OF OUR DECISION B-157362, DATED NOVEMBER 22, 1965, DENYING YOUR PROTEST AGAINST AN AWARD OF A CONTRACT UNDER INVITATION FOR BIDS NO. CIVENG-22-052-65-24, TO ANYONE OTHER THAN YOURSELF.

IN THIS REGARD YOU ARE INFORMED THAT DECISIONS ISSUED BY THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES WILL BE RECONSIDERED UPON REQUEST. UPON RECEIPT OF YOUR LETTER OF DECEMBER 3, 1965, THIS OFFICE THOROUGHLY REVIEWED THE FACTS AND FINDING IN YOUR CASE AND IT IS OUR OPINION THAT IT WAS PROPERLY DECIDED. HOWEVER, IF YOU HAVE ANY NEW EVIDENCE WHICH YOU FEEL IS DETERMINATIVE, YOU MAY FEEL FREE TO SUBMIT IT TO THIS OFFICE FOR CONSIDERATION. IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT AN AWARD HAS ALREADY BEEN MADE TO BALDWIN-LIMA-HAMILTON CORPORATION UNDER THE ABOVE-REFERENCED INVITATION, WE STRONGLY SUGGEST THAT ANY SUCH EVIDENCE BE CLEAR, CONVINCING, AND SUBSTANTIAL. IN THE EVENT YOU HAVE NO SUCH PROOF TO PRESENT TO US, WE WILL CONSIDER THAT OUR FILE IN THE MATTER IS CLOSED.

GAO Contacts

Office of Public Affairs