Skip to main content

B-134990, FEB. 28, 1958

B-134990 Feb 28, 1958
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

SINCE A SIMILAR CLAIM PREVIOUSLY FILED BY YOU WAS DISALLOWED IN OUR SETTLEMENT OF APRIL 18. YOUR LETTER WILL BE CONSIDERED AS REQUESTING REVIEW OF THAT SETTLEMENT. THE 1ST ENGINEER ARCTIC TASK FORCE WAS DIRECTED TO PROCEED FROM FORT BELVOIR TO MCGUIRE AIR FORCE BASE. UPON THE COMPLETION OF WHICH IT WAS TO RETURN TO FORT BELVOIR. SUCH ORDERS CONTAINED THE PROVISION "TRAVEL AND TEMPORARY DUTY PERFORMED IS FIELD DUTY AS CONTEMPLATED BY JOINT TRAVEL REGULATIONS. PER DIEM IS NOT AUTHORIZED.'. THE RETURN OF THE TASK FORCE TO FORT BELVOIR WAS DIRECTED BY ORDERS OF HEADQUARTERS. THOSE ORDERS ALSO STATED THAT THE TRAVEL AND TEMPORARY DUTY PERFORMED "IS FIELD DUTY AS CONTEMPLATED BY JOINT TRAVEL REGULATIONS.'.

View Decision

B-134990, FEB. 28, 1958

TO MR. LAWRENCE F. PETKOVSEK:

IN LETTER OF AUGUST 15, 1957, FORWARDED TO US BY THE FINANCE CENTER, U.S. ARMY, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA, YOU MAKE CLAIM FOR PER DIEM INCIDENT TO TEMPORARY DUTY PERFORMED IN GREENLAND AS AN ENLISTED MEMBER OF THE 1ST ENGINEER ARCTIC TASK FORCE UNDER ORDERS OF HEADQUARTERS, THE ENGINEER CENTER AND FORT BELVOIR, FORT BELVOIR, VIRGINIA, DATED JANUARY 30, 1956. SINCE A SIMILAR CLAIM PREVIOUSLY FILED BY YOU WAS DISALLOWED IN OUR SETTLEMENT OF APRIL 18, 1956, YOUR LETTER WILL BE CONSIDERED AS REQUESTING REVIEW OF THAT SETTLEMENT.

UNDER THE ORDERS OF JANUARY 30, 1956, THE 1ST ENGINEER ARCTIC TASK FORCE WAS DIRECTED TO PROCEED FROM FORT BELVOIR TO MCGUIRE AIR FORCE BASE, NEW JERSEY, AND THENCE TO THULE, GREENLAND, ON TEMPORARY CHANGE OF STATION FOR A PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY NINE MONTHS, UPON THE COMPLETION OF WHICH IT WAS TO RETURN TO FORT BELVOIR. SUCH ORDERS CONTAINED THE PROVISION "TRAVEL AND TEMPORARY DUTY PERFORMED IS FIELD DUTY AS CONTEMPLATED BY JOINT TRAVEL REGULATIONS. PER DIEM IS NOT AUTHORIZED.' YOU LEFT FORT BELVOIR UNDER THOSE ORDERS ON MAY 1 AND ARRIVED AT THULE ON MAY 4, 1956. THE RETURN OF THE TASK FORCE TO FORT BELVOIR WAS DIRECTED BY ORDERS OF HEADQUARTERS, 1ST ENGINEER ARCTIC TASK FORCE, DATED SEPTEMBER 9, 1956. THOSE ORDERS ALSO STATED THAT THE TRAVEL AND TEMPORARY DUTY PERFORMED "IS FIELD DUTY AS CONTEMPLATED BY JOINT TRAVEL REGULATIONS.' YOU LEFT THULE UNDER THE ORDERS ON OCTOBER 9, AND ARRIVED AT FORT BELVOIR ON OCTOBER 11, 1956. CHANGE 6 OF JULY 24, 1957, TO THE BASIC ORDERS OF JANUARY 30, 1956, PURPORTS TO AMEND THAT PART OF SUCH BASIC ORDERS PROVIDING "PER DIEM IS NOT AUTHORIZED" TO READ"PER DIEM IS AUTHORIZED.'

REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE ENTITLEMENT OF MEMBERS OF THE UNIFORMED SERVICES TO TRAVEL AND TRANSPORTATION ALLOWANCES ARE CONTAINED IN THE JOINT TRAVEL REGULATIONS. PARAGRAPH 4250-3 OF THOSE REGULATIONS PROVIDES THAT MEMBERS TRAVELING OR PERFORMING TEMPORARY DUTY OUTSIDE CONTINENTAL UNITED STATES ARE NOT ENTITLED TO TRAVEL PER DIEM ALLOWANCES "WHILE PARTICIPATING IN MANEUVERS, FIELD EXERCISES, SIMULATED WAR GAMES, TRAINING ENCAMPMENTS FOR THE RESERVE COMPONENTS OR RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS STUDENTS, AND OTHER SIMILAR ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING DUTY AS OBSERVER OR UMPIRE) WHERE BOTH RATIONS IN KIND (INCLUDING FIELD RATIONS) AND QUARTERS ARE AVAILABLE OR FURNISHED, WHETHER OR NOT SUCH FACILITIES ARE UTILIZED.' SIMILAR RESTRICTIONS COVERING TRAVEL PERFORMED IN THE UNITED STATES ARE CONTAINED IN PARAGRAPH 4201-6 OF THE REGULATIONS. IN DECISION OF AUGUST 22, 1957, 37 COMP. GEN. 126, IT WAS STATED THAT THE QUESTION OF WHETHER A PARTICULAR ASSIGNMENT FALLS WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THOSE PROVISIONS IS ONE OF FACT, DETERMINED USUALLY ON THE BASIS OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE EVALUATION OF THE FACTS SURROUNDING THE ASSIGNMENT BECAUSE OF THE PROXIMITY OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL TO THE LOCAL CIRCUMSTANCES UPON WHICH THE EVALUATION MUST REST, AND THAT IF THAT DETERMINATION LATER IS TO BE CHANGED, THE SECOND DETERMINATION ALSO MUST BE BASED ON AN EVALUATION OF THE FACTS SURROUNDING THE PARTICULAR DUTY ASSIGNMENT. TO BE EFFECTIVE, SUCH SECOND DETERMINATION OF NECESSITY MUST HAVE AS ITS BASIS SUFFICIENT INFORMATION OR FACTS TO ESTABLISH THAT THE FIRST DETERMINATION CLEARLY WAS ERRONEOUS.

THE PURPORTED AMENDMENT OF JULY 24, 1957, TO THE ORDERS OF JANUARY 30, 1956, DOES NOT PROVIDE GROUNDS SUFFICIENT TO OVERCOME THE FIELD DUTY RESTRICTIONS OF THOSE ORDERS WHICH CONSTITUTED AN ADMINISTRATIVE DETERMINATION THAT THE TRAVEL AND TEMPORARY DUTY ASSIGNED WERE OF THE TYPE CONTEMPLATED BY PARAGRAPHS 4201-6 AND 4250-3 OF THE JOINT TRAVEL REGULATIONS. IT MUST BE CONCLUDED, THEREFORE, THAT NO PROPER BASIS EXISTS FOR THE ALLOWANCE OF YOUR CLAIM. ACCORDINGLY, THE SETTLEMENT OF APRIL 18, 1957, IS SUSTAINED.

GAO Contacts

Office of Public Affairs