[Protest of Forest Service Contract Award for Mobile Food Services]

A firm protested a Forest Service contract award for mobile food services, contending that the Forest Service: (1) unreasonably evaluated its proposal; and (2) unreasonably evaluated its past performance. GAO held that the Forest Service reasonably: (1) evaluated the protester's bid in accordance with the solicitation's evaluation criteria; and (2) considered the protester's past performance on a predecessor contract. Accordingly, the protest was denied.