Skip to main content

[Protest of Navy Procurement of Database Management System]

B-260963 Published: May 04, 1995. Publicly Released: May 04, 1995.
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

A firm protested the Navy's procurement of a relational database management system, contending that the Navy: (1) conducted a de facto procurement without issuing a solicitation; (2) used unreasonable evaluation criteria to evaluate its unsolicited bid; (3) engaged in an improper auction; and (4) intended to meet its needs by improperly modifying an existing contract beyond its current scope. GAO held that the: (1) protester untimely filed its protest more than 10 days after it knew the basis of protest; and (2) protest did not meet the exception standards to the timeliness requirement. Accordingly, the protest was dismissed.

View Decision

B-187198, APRIL 18, 1977

AN EMPLOYEE WHO UPON ARRIVAL AT HIS TEMPORARY DUTY STATION ABANDONS HIS OFFICIAL TRAVEL DUE TO ILLNESS IN HIS FAMILY IS NOT ENTITLED TO THE TRAVEL AND TRASNPORTATION EXPENSES INCURRED IN RETURNING TO HEADQUARTERS, NOTWITHSTANDING THE EMPLOYEE WAS DIRECTED BY HIS SUPERIOR TO RETURN, OR THAT HE EXPERIENCED SEVERE TRAUMA UPON LEARNING OF HIS WIFE'S ILLNESS AND WAS GRANTED 4 HOURS OF SICK LEAVE FOR THE REMAINER OF THE DAY.

GARY B. CHURCHILL - TRAVEL EXPENSES INCURRED DUE TO ILLNESS IN EMPLOYEE'S FAMILY:

MR. RALPH F. SHAWLEE, A CERTIFYING OFFICER OF THE NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION (NASA), BY LETTER DATED AUGUST 9, 1976, REQUESTED AN ADVANCE DECISION AS TO WHETHER NASA MAY PROPERLY PAY THE COST OF RETURN TRAVEL FROM DALLAS, TEXAS, TO MOFFETT FIELD, CALIFORNIA, OF MR. GARY B. CHURCHILL, AN EMPLOYEE OF NASA.

THE PERTINENT FACTS AS PRESENTED BY THE CERTIFYING OFFICER SHOW THAT MR. CHURCHILL LEFT HIS PERMANENT DUTY STATION AT MOFFETT FIELD, CALIFORNIA, THE MORNING OF MAY 4, 1976, AND TRAVELED BY AIR TO DALLAS/FT. WORTH AIRPORT TO COORDINATE VARIOUS TESTS AT BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON, DALLAS, TEXAS. UPON MR. CHURCHILL'S ARRIVAL AT THE DALLAS/FT. WORTH AIRPORT, HE WAS ADVISED THAT HIS SUPERVISOR HAD TELEPHONED WITH THE INFORMATION THAT MR. CHURCHILL'S WIFE HAD BEEN STRICKEN WITH A RESPIRATORY ARREST AND WAS IN THE INTENSIVE CARE UNIT OF A HOSPITAL AT MR. CHURCHILL'S PERMANENT DUTY STATION. FURTHER, MR. CHURCHILL, ACTING UPON THIS INFORMATION, ABANDONED HIS TEMPORARY DUTY STATION AND RETURNED TO SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA, AT 3:20 P.M. ON MAY 4, 1976. IN A MEMORANDUM DATED JULY 14, 1976, AND FORWARDED TO US BY THE CERTIFYING OFFICER, MR. CHURCHILL STATES THAT HIS RETURN TRIP SHOULD BE AT GOVERNMENT EXPENSE BECAUSE HE HAD EXPERIENCED A SEVERE TRAUMA AND WAS IN FACT PLACED ON SICK LEAVE FOR 4 HOURS AFTER RECEIVING THE INFORMATION CONCERNING HIS WIFE'S ILLNESS. FURTHER, 5 U.S.C. 5702(B) AND FEDERAL TRAVEL REGULATIONS, PARAGRAPH 1-2.4 PROVIDE TAHT WHEN AN EMPLOYEE, WHO WHILE TRAVELING AWAY FROM HIS OFFICIAL STATION ON OFFICIAL BUSINESS BECOMES INCAPACITATED THROUGH ILLNESS, TRANSPORTATION EXPENSES MAY BE AUTHORIZED.

AS THE CERTIFYING OFFICER POINTS OUT IN HIS SUBMISSION, WE HAVE HELD THAT AN EMPLOYEE WHO UPON ARRIVAL AT HIS TEMPORARY DUTY STATION ABANDONS HIS OFFICIAL TRAVEL DUE TO AN ILLNESS IN HIS FAMILY IS NOT ENTITLED TO THE TRAVEL AND TRASNPORTATION EXPENSES IN RETURNING TO HIS HEADQUARTERS BUT MAY BE REIMBURSED ONLY THE COST OF OFFICIAL TRAVEL TO THE POINT OF ABANDONMENT. 47 COMP.GEN. 59 (1967). THAT RULE IS APPLICABLE HERE. ACCORDINGLY, MR. CHURCHILL IS NOT ENTITLED TO REIMBURSEMENT OF THE COST OF TRAVEL FOR HIS RETURN TRIP FROM DALLAS TO SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA.

IF MR. CHURCHILL HAD ABANDONED HIS TEMPORARY ASSIGNMENT PRIMARILY BECAUSE OF HIS ILLNESS OR IF HE HAD BEEN DIRECTED TO RETURN FOR OFFICIAL PURPOSES, THERE IS NO DOUBT THAT HE PROPERLY COULD HAVE BEEN REIMBURSED FOR THE RETURN TRIP FROM DALLAS/FT. WORTH TO SAN JOSE DESPITE THE FACT THAT HE HAD NOT COMPLETED THE CONTEMPLATED ASSIGNMENT IN DALLAS. HOWEVER, HE WAS NOT INSTRUCTED TO ABANDON HIS ASSIGNMENT IN DALLAS FOR OFFICIAL REASONS. THE SOLE BASIS FOR TERMINATING HIS ASSIGNMENT WAS PERSONAL. FURTHER, MR. CHURCHILL'S ILLNESS OCCURRED AFTER HE WAS INSTRUCTED TO RETURN TO SAN JOSE, AND IT APPEARS THAT THE CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH PRECIPITATED MR. CHURCHILL'S RETURN WOULD STILL HAVE RESULTED IN HIS ABANDONMENT EVEN IF MR. CHURCHILL HAD NOT SUFFERED TRAUMA. THEREFORE, WE ARE UNABLE TO CONCLUDE THAT MR. CHURCHILL'S RETURN TRIP WAS THE DIRECT RESULT OF HIS ILLNESS.

THE TRAVEL VOUCHER OF MR. CHURCHILL MAY NOT BE CERTIFIED FOR PAYMENT.

Office of Public Affairs

Topics

Application softwareBid evaluation protestsContract modificationsDatabase management systemsNaval procurementPurchase ordersUntimely protestsU.S. Navy