Skip to main content

[Protest of DLA Contract Award for Maintenance]

B-252393.2 Published: Dec 08, 1993. Publicly Released: Dec 08, 1993.
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

A firm protested a Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) contract award for computer equipment maintenance services, contending that DLA: (1) should have awarded it the contract as the low bidder; and (2) failed to consider its past technical experience. GAO held that DLA: (1) reasonably determined that the awardee's bid was the most advantageous to the government; (2) was not required to make award to the low bidder; and (3) reasonably evaluated the bidders' prior experience and made award to the technically superior bidder. Accordingly, the protest was denied.

Office of Public Affairs

Topics

Bid evaluation protestsBid responsivenessComputer services contractsContract award protestsDefense procurementMaintenance services contractsTechnical proposal evaluationSolicitations