Skip to main content

[Army Employee's Claim for Real Estate Expense]

B-245614 Mar 20, 1992
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

A transferred civilian Army employee claimed reimbursement for a mortgage credit certificate application fee she incurred incident to purchasing a residence at her new duty station, contending that the fee constituted a reimbursable real estate expense. GAO held that the: (1) federal travel regulations (FTR) did not identify the fee as a reimbursable expense; (2) fee was not required to obtain a mortgage loan; and (3) fee was not similar in nature to loan application fees that were reimbursable under FTR. Accordingly, the claim was denied.

Downloads

GAO Contacts

Shirley A. Jones
Managing Associate General Counsel
Office of the General Counsel

Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
Managing Director
Office of Public Affairs

Public Inquiries