[Protest of Army Contract Award for Security Alarm System]

B-241254: Jan 16, 1991

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protested an Army contract award for security alarm system services, contending that the: (1) specified evaluation factors unduly restricted competition; (2) Army improperly evaluated bids; and (3) Army improperly released its price to the awardee. GAO held that the: (1) protester untimely filed its protest regarding unduly restrictive evaluation factors; (2) protest regarding improper evaluation of bids was academic, since the Army initiated appropriate corrective action; and (3) protester untimely filed its protest regarding the Army's release of its bid. Accordingly, the protest was dismissed.

Nov 22, 2017

Nov 21, 2017

  • A-P-T Research, Inc.
    We deny the protest in part and dismiss the protest in part.

Nov 20, 2017

Nov 16, 2017

  • HBI-GF, JV
    We deny the protest.
  • Epsilon Systems Solutions, Inc.
    We dismiss the protest because it raises a matter of contract administration over which we do not exercise jurisdiction.

Nov 15, 2017

Looking for more? Browse all our products here