[Protest of Air Force Contract Award for Food Services]

A firm protested an Air Force contract award for food services, contending that the Air Force: (1) intended to modify the awardee's contract to include other services not covered by the solicitation; and (2) was biased in evaluating its proposal because of its prior disputes with the Air Force. GAO held that the: (1) protest of the alleged modification to the awardee's contract was without merit, since the Air Force operated the facility with government employees, and it was uncertain whether the facility would be completed prior to award; and (2) protester failed to show that the Air Force's evaluation was unreasonable. Accordingly, the protest was denied.