[Protests of Navy Contract Award for Oiler Ship Design and Construction]

B-231923,B-231923.2: Nov 3, 1988

Additional Materials:

Contact:

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

Two firms protested any Navy contract award to another firm for oiler ship design and construction. One protester contended that the Navy: (1) improperly included a solicitation specification for the possible consideration of industrial mobilization factors; and (2) originally solicited offers in bad faith, since it had improperly evaluated contract costs. Both protesters contended that the Navy improperly: (1) cancelled the original solicitation; and (2) conducted an auction by issuing an amendment which allowed the incumbent contractor to compete for the contract. The second protester also contended that the: (1) Navy improperly conducted discussions with the incumbent contractor; (2) incumbent contractor had a competitive advantage; and (3) Navy contradicted its policy regarding an industrial mobilization base by allowing the incumbent contractor to compete. GAO held that the first protester: (1) untimely filed its protest regarding alleged solicitation improprieties after bid opening; and (2) failed to show that the Navy acted in bad faith. GAO also held that the Navy: (1) properly cancelled the original solicitation, since it lacked sufficient funds; (2) did not conduct an auction, since it revealed the bid on an existing contract; (3) did not conduct improper discussions with the incumbent contractor; (4) was not required to eliminate the incumbent contractor's advantages; and (5) did not violate its mobilization-base policy, since funding limitations required the solicitation amendment. Accordingly, the protests were dismissed in part and denied in part.

Nov 22, 2017

Nov 21, 2017

  • A-P-T Research, Inc.
    We deny the protest in part and dismiss the protest in part.
    B-414825,B-414825.2

Nov 20, 2017

Nov 16, 2017

  • HBI-GF, JV
    We deny the protest.
    B-415036
  • Epsilon Systems Solutions, Inc.
    We dismiss the protest because it raises a matter of contract administration over which we do not exercise jurisdiction.
    B-414410.4

Nov 15, 2017

Looking for more? Browse all our products here