[Protest of Proposed Army Contract Award]

A firm protested a contract award to another firm under an Army solicitation for lodging, meals, and transportation, contending that the awardee: (1) failed to comply with the terms of a previous contract for similar services; and (2) could not meet certain solicitation specifications. GAO held that the matter was one of bidder responsibility, which it would not consider absent allegations of fraud, bad faith, or violations of procurement regulations. Accordingly, the protest was dismissed.