Skip to main content

Bid Rejected as Nonresponsive because of Provision for Charge for Past-Due Accounts

B-192408 Aug 04, 1978
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

A company protested the rejection of its bid as nonresponsive, contending that it should be permitted to delete a statement, unintentionally stamped on the bid, which imposed a 1.5 percent charge per month on past-due accounts. The protest was summarily denied because the bid was properly determined to be nonresponsive since the statement affected price and could not be deleted or waived as a minor informality or irregularity.

Downloads

GAO Contacts

Edward (Ed) Goldstein
Managing Associate General Counsel
Office of the General Counsel

Kenneth E. Patton
Managing Associate General Counsel
Office of the General Counsel

Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
Managing Director
Office of Public Affairs

Public Inquiries