Key Issues > Disaster Management
government icon, source: Eyewire

Disaster Management

The destruction caused by Hurricane Sandy and the extensive rebuilding underway in New York and New Jersey is a jarring reminder of how sudden and devastating unplanned, catastrophic events can be. Disaster management—preparation, response, recovery, and mitigation—can be costly, and typically involves the efforts of multiple federal agencies, multiple levels of government, and the private and non-profit sector. The National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), is also an important element of disaster management, but comprehensive reforms will need to be implemented successfully to ensure the program’s stability.

  1. Share with Facebook 
  2. Share with Twitter 
  3. Share with LinkedIn 
  4. Share with mail 

The effectiveness of U.S. disaster management efforts can be examined through five themes that are important to successful disaster management efforts:

  • Clearly defined roles and responsibilities. Having clearly defined, coordinated, and well-understood roles and responsibilities for all levels of government and their nongovernmental partners is critical in coordinating the development and implementation of the responsibilities of the various parties involved.
  • Developing and Assessing Capabilities. Developing the capabilities needed for catastrophic disasters should be part of an overall national effort designed to integrate and define what needs to be done, where, by whom, and how well coupled with the creation and use of metrics for assessing current capabilities and identifying key gaps that need to be filled. Ensuring needed capabilities are ready requires effective planning and coordination, plus robust training and exercises in which the capabilities are realistically tested and problems are identified and subsequently addressed in partnership with federal, state, local, and nongovernmental stakeholders. In addition, integrating an all-hazards risk management framework into decision making is central to assessing catastrophic disaster risks and guiding the development of national capabilities to prevent or mitigate where possible and respond to such risks.
  • Effective coordination and collaboration among relevant stakeholders. Response to and recovery from a major disaster is a complex process that involves an extensive group of participants both across the federal government and at the state and local level. Recovery may take years. At least 14 federal departments and agencies are responsible for administering dozens of recovery-related programs, many of which rely heavily on active participation by state and local government for their implementation. Because these parties are dependent on each other to accomplish recovery goals, sustained focus and effective coordination and collaboration are essential.
  • Accountability. Accountability controls and mechanisms ensure that resources are used appropriately for valid purposes. Following a catastrophic disaster, decision makers face a tension between the demand for rapid response and recovery assistance—including assistance to victims—and implementing appropriate controls and accountability mechanisms.
  • Periodic evaluation of and reporting on these coordinated efforts. Collaboration between recovery partners can be enhanced by periodically evaluating and reporting on what worked, what can be improved, and what progress is still needed to address long-term recovery goals. This will assist decision makers, clients, and stakeholders to obtain the feedback needed to improve both the policy and operational effectiveness of recovery efforts.

Although the NFIP is an integral element of the federal government’s efforts to minimize damage from floods, it will not generate sufficient revenues to repay the billions of dollars borrowed from the Treasury. As of September 2012, NFIP owed almost $17.8 billion to the Treasury for loans used to cover losses from the 2005 hurricanes. Operational and management challenges at FEMA, which administers the NFIP, have hampered the agency’s ability to stabilize the program. GAO has made numerous recommendations aimed at improving financial controls, oversight of private insurers and contractors, and FEMA’s management of NFIP. The Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 (the Act) addresses a number of these weaknesses, but the extent to which the changes included in the Act will reduce the financial exposure created by the program is not yet clear. Losses from Hurricane Sandy are expected to create additional financial challenges for the program.

Looking for our recommendations? Click on any report to find each associated recommendation and its current implementation status.

Flood Insurance

Economic Development

Homeland Defense

Disaster Recovery

Disaster Recovery

Catastrophic Disasters

More Reports

Disaster Assistance Workforce

Disaster Recovery

Homeland Security

Homeland Security

Haiti Reconstruction

Measuring Disaster Preparedness

Disaster Response

Rebuilding Iraq

Iraq and Afghanistan

There are no other materials currently linked to this content
  • portrait of William O. Jenkins, Jr.
    • William O. Jenkins, Jr.
    • Director, Homeland Security and Justice
    • JenkinsWO@gao.gov
    • (202) 512-8757
  • portrait of Orice Williams Brown
    • Orice Williams Brown
    • Managing Director, Financial Markets and Community Investment
    • williamso@gao.gov
    • (202) 512-9678
  • portrait of Stan Czerwinski
  • portrait of David Gootnick
    • David Gootnick
    • Director, International Affairs and Trade
    • gootnickd@gao.gov
    • (202) 512-3149