Science and the Environment: Green Building
Year Identified: 2012
Area Number: 26
Area Type: Fragmentation, Overlap & Duplication
◐- Partially Addressed
○- Not Addressed
◉- Consolidated or Other
⊘- Closed-Partially Addressed
⊗- Closed-Not Addressed
Last Updated:March 6, 2015
To help assess the results of investments in individual federal initiatives to foster green building in the nonfederal sector, as well as their combined results, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the Department of Energy (Energy), and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) should lead an effort with other agencies that are implementing green building initiatives to collaborate on identifying performance information, such as shared goals and common performance measures, for green building initiatives for the nonfederal sector.
HUD, Energy, and EPA have taken steps to collaborate on identifying performance information for green building initiatives for the nonfederal sector (i.e., private, state, local, and tribal entities), as GAO recommended in November 2011, but they have not completed actions that could better ensure agencies collaborate on assessing results government-wide.In November 2012, HUD, in consultation with Energy and EPA, issued a preliminary report responding to GAO’s recommendation. The report concludes that, in the short term, cooperation can best occur within existing federal authorities but that, in the long term, a higher level of centralized collaboration may require additional legislative or executive authority. It also concludes that, in the short term, green building initiatives are best served through existing interagency partnerships that involve these three agencies. The report states that the White House Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ)—which coordinates the President’s environmental efforts—may be well-positioned to convene agencies and consult with agency staff to develop shared performance goals for green development in the nonfederal sector. In November 2013, HUD officials reported that the agency further coordinates related activities with Energy, EPA, and other agencies through government-wide collaboration on the President’s Climate Action Plan, which CEQ manages. In March 2014, Energy and EPA officials identified additional existing interagency partnerships, including the PowerSaver Loan Program, through which Energy and HUD have entered into an interagency agreement to promote HUD's loan program for energy efficiency, and EPA’s participation on the Federal Interagency Committee on Indoor Air Quality. HUD officials also reported plans to survey the agencies identified by GAO in November 2011 and convene a follow-up meeting of these agencies to assess the extent to which common performance measures exist for green building initiatives for the nonfederal sector. In November 2014, HUD officials provided an update stating that, given the significant interagency involvement that would be required to implement this action, HUD has requested CEQ’s leadership in facilitating the survey and that HUD is committed to working with CEQ and other agencies on reporting the findings.
GAO agrees that, in the short term, existing federal partnerships and authorities offer important opportunities for agencies to collaborate on green building initiatives for the nonfederal sector. However, without comprehensive information about each individual initiative’s progress toward fostering green building, and without collaboration across federal agencies to establish green building goals and ways to measure progress, Congress, agency heads, and the public have incomplete information about the results of individual and overall federal efforts to foster green building in the nonfederal sector and the efficiency of these efforts. Therefore, in the long term, it will be important for HUD, Energy, and EPA—the agencies implementing most (about two-thirds) of the initiatives GAO identified—to take actions necessary to better ensure agencies collaborate on the initiatives to identify shared goals and adopt common performance measures to assess results government-wide. Such an effort could include HUD’s proposed survey and related actions and could help identify opportunities for enhancing efficiency and reducing costs to administer these initiatives.